Maps & Navigation · head to head
CARTO vs NAPA
The short version
- Only CARTO has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CARTO no prices are published; the committed tiers are all quote-only; NAPA the Internet Archive's capture of NAPA's homepage on 1 January 2020 named six distinct maritime software products, NAPA Loading Computer, NAPA Emergency Computer, NAPA Logbook, NAPA Fleet Intelligence, NAPA Voyage Optimization and ClassNK-NAPA GREEN, with no price figure published for any.
- They diverge on capability: CARTO covers Spatial Analysis, NAPA covers Ship design.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CARTO and NAPA actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CARTO
- Spatial Analysis
- Interactive Maps
- Data Observatory
- Workflows
- APIs
- Snowflake
- BigQuery
- PostgreSQL
Only in NAPA
- Ship design
- Stability calculation
- Voyage optimization
- Performance monitoring
- CAD systems
- Fleet management
- Weather routing
- Windows support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CARTO
- Spatial analysis over data already in a cloud warehousenot NAPA
- Building interactive maps and location dashboardsnot NAPA
- Geocoding and routing through location data servicesnot NAPA
- Site selection and territory planningnot NAPA
- Self-hosted geospatial analytics for regulated environmentsnot NAPA
NAPA
No use cases recorded yet. See the NAPA review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CARTO
- No prices are published; the committed tiers are all quote-only
- Metered on four separate axes: workflow runs, map loads, API calls and location data service operations
- API access and tokens are limited on pay-as-you-go and unlimited only from the Strategic tier
- Self-hosting is available on Enterprise and included only on the Custom tier
- The 14 day trial explicitly forbids production use
NAPA
- The Internet Archive's capture of NAPA's homepage on 1 January 2020 named six distinct maritime software products, NAPA Loading Computer, NAPA Emergency Computer, NAPA Logbook, NAPA Fleet Intelligence, NAPA Voyage Optimization and ClassNK-NAPA GREEN, with no price figure published for any.
Pricing, plan by plan
CARTO
Free- Professional$199/month
- Spatial Analysis
- Data Observatory
- Builder
NAPA
$5000/year- Fleet Intelligence$15000/year
- Voyage optimization
- Performance monitoring
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose CARTO if
- You need spatial analysis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want interactive maps.
Choose NAPA if
- You need ship design.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want stability calculation.
Questions people ask
- Is CARTO or NAPA better?
- Neither clearly leads. CARTO starts at Free and NAPA at $5000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CARTO or NAPA?
- CARTO has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CARTO and $5000/year for NAPA.
- Does CARTO or NAPA run on more platforms?
- CARTO runs on Web. NAPA runs on Windows, Web.
- Can I use CARTO for free?
- Yes. CARTO has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NAPA starts at $5000/year.
- What is CARTO best used for?
- CARTO is most often used for spatial analysis over data already in a cloud warehouse, building interactive maps and location dashboards, geocoding and routing through location data services, site selection and territory planning. Of those, spatial analysis over data already in a cloud warehouse and building interactive maps and location dashboards are not what NAPA is typically brought in for.
- What can CARTO do that NAPA cannot?
- CARTO covers Spatial Analysis, Interactive Maps, Data Observatory, Workflows. NAPA covers Ship design, Stability calculation, Voyage optimization, Performance monitoring. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CARTO vs Mapbox
- CARTO vs Google Maps Platform
- CARTO vs HERE Technologies
- CARTO vs Apple Maps
- CARTO vs Leaflet
- CARTO vs Esri ArcGIS
- CARTO vs CesiumJS
- CARTO vs Samsara
- CARTO vs Bing Maps
- CARTO vs Geotab
- CARTO vs GraphHopper
- CARTO vs HERE WeGo
- CARTO vs IndoorAtlas
- CARTO vs Mappedin
- CARTO vs Verizon Connect
- CARTO vs AllTrails
- CARTO vs Citymapper
- CARTO vs deck.gl
- CARTO vs MarineTraffic
- CARTO vs ChartCo
- CARTO vs Kongsberg Maritime
- CARTO vs Sea Machines
- CARTO vs Veson Nautical
- CARTO vs Wartsila Voyage
- CARTO vs Windward
- CARTO vs Dataloy
- CARTO vs DNV Maritime
- CARTO vs exactEarth
- CARTO vs FourKites
- CARTO vs Freightos
- CARTO vs INTTRA
- CARTO vs Kpler
- CARTO vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- CARTO vs Nautilus Labs
- CARTO vs Navis N4
- CARTO vs NAVTOR
- NAPA vs Mapbox
- NAPA vs Google Maps Platform
- NAPA vs HERE Technologies
- NAPA vs Apple Maps
- NAPA vs Leaflet
- NAPA vs Esri ArcGIS
- NAPA vs CesiumJS
- NAPA vs Samsara
- NAPA vs Bing Maps
- NAPA vs Geotab
- NAPA vs GraphHopper
- NAPA vs HERE WeGo
- NAPA vs IndoorAtlas
- NAPA vs Mappedin
- NAPA vs Verizon Connect
- NAPA vs AllTrails
- NAPA vs Citymapper
- NAPA vs deck.gl
- NAPA vs MarineTraffic
- NAPA vs ChartCo
- NAPA vs Kongsberg Maritime
- NAPA vs Sea Machines
- NAPA vs Veson Nautical
- NAPA vs Wartsila Voyage
- NAPA vs Windward
- NAPA vs Dataloy
- NAPA vs DNV Maritime
- NAPA vs exactEarth
- NAPA vs FourKites
- NAPA vs Freightos
- NAPA vs INTTRA
- NAPA vs Kpler
- NAPA vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- NAPA vs Nautilus Labs
- NAPA vs Navis N4
- NAPA vs NAVTOR

