Softwr

Maps & Navigation · head to head

Bing Maps vs Maptek I-Site

Bing Maps logo

Bing Maps

Maps & Navigation

Web mapping services with street maps, aerial imagery, and APIs for developers

From
On request
Rated
-
Maptek I-Site logo

Maptek I-Site

Mining & Resources

3D laser scanning and point cloud processing

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bing Maps bing Maps API keys are split into Basic (free-use, capped) and Enterprise (billable) tiers, and Spatial Data Services requests exceeding 1,000,000 per year are billable even when a session ID is used, per Microsoft's own developer documentation.; Maptek I-Site the workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
  • They diverge on capability: Bing Maps covers Core Functionality, Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bing Maps and Maptek I-Site actually diverge.

Attributes where Bing Maps and Maptek I-Site differ
AttributeBing MapsMaptek I-Site
Pricing modelfreemiumsubscription
PlatformsWebWindows
CategoryMaps & NavigationMining & Resources
FoundedUnknown1981

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bing Maps

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

Only in Maptek I-Site

  • Point cloud processing
  • 3D model creation
  • Pit wall monitoring
  • Stockpile measurement
  • Change detection
  • Vulcan
  • CAD systems
  • GIS platforms

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bing Maps

No use cases recorded yet. See the Bing Maps review.

Maptek I-Site

  • Laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workingsnot Bing Maps
  • Geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopesnot Bing Maps
  • Volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud datanot Bing Maps

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bing Maps

  • Bing Maps API keys are split into Basic (free-use, capped) and Enterprise (billable) tiers, and Spatial Data Services requests exceeding 1,000,000 per year are billable even when a session ID is used, per Microsoft's own developer documentation.

Maptek I-Site

  • The workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
  • Scanner range is fixed per model, at 1,000 m for the NS4, 2,800 m for the XR3, 1,200 m for the XR3-D and 3,500 m for the UR3, so range upgrades mean buying different hardware
  • No price, licence type or subscription term is published; the page offers only a spec sheet request and a contact form

Pricing, plan by plan

Bing Maps

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Bing Maps review.

Maptek I-Site

On request
  • I-Site Studio$11000/year
    • Point cloud processing
    • 3D modeling
    • Pit wall analysis

Which should you pick?

Choose Bing Maps if

  • You need core functionality.
  • You also want user interface.

Choose Maptek I-Site if

  • You need point cloud processing.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want 3d model creation.

Questions people ask

Is Bing Maps or Maptek I-Site better?
Neither clearly leads. Bing Maps starts at On request and Maptek I-Site at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bing Maps or Maptek I-Site?
Bing Maps starts at On request and Maptek I-Site at On request.
Does Bing Maps or Maptek I-Site run on more platforms?
Bing Maps runs on Web. Maptek I-Site runs on Windows.
What can Bing Maps do that Maptek I-Site cannot?
Bing Maps covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, 3D model creation, Pit wall monitoring, Stockpile measurement.

Related pages

Other head to heads