Log Management · head to head
Loki vs Filebeat
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention; Filebeat filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.
- They diverge on capability: Loki covers Log aggregation, Filebeat covers File tailing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loki and Filebeat actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Log Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Only in Filebeat
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
- Input harvesting
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Filebeat
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Filebeat
Filebeat
- Log monitoringnot Loki
- Application performancenot Loki
- Security analyticsnot Loki
- Troubleshootingnot Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Filebeat
- Filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Filebeat
Free- FreeFree
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
Which should you pick?
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Filebeat if
- You need file tailing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log forwarding.
Questions people ask
- Is Loki or Filebeat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loki starts at Free and Filebeat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loki or Filebeat?
- Loki starts at Free and Filebeat at Free.
- Does Loki or Filebeat run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Loki best used for?
- Loki is most often used for aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing, querying logs alongside metrics in grafana. Of those, aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing and querying logs alongside metrics in grafana are not what Filebeat is typically brought in for.
- What can Loki do that Filebeat cannot?
- Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Filebeat covers File tailing, Log forwarding, Event parsing, Input harvesting. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Grafana Loki
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Bugsnag
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Elastic
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Filebeat vs Elastic Stack
- Filebeat vs New Relic
- Filebeat vs Datadog Logs
- Filebeat vs Coralogix
- Filebeat vs Grafana Loki
- Filebeat vs CloudWatch
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace
- Filebeat vs InfluxDB
- Filebeat vs Airbrake
- Filebeat vs AppDynamics
- Filebeat vs Axiom
- Filebeat vs Azure Monitor
- Filebeat vs Better Stack
- Filebeat vs Bugsnag
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace Logs
- Filebeat vs Elastic
- Filebeat vs Elastic APM
- Filebeat vs Elasticsearch Service


