Software · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Bruno

Bruno
Software
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat; Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Bruno covers API Testing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Bruno actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Bruno |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Windows, MacOS, Linux |
| Founded | 2016 | 2022 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- GitHub
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- API Developmentnot Bruno
- API Gatewaynot Bruno
- API Testingnot Bruno
- API Documentationnot Bruno
- Microservicesnot Bruno
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot GraphQL Apollo
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot GraphQL Apollo
- Offline API development without an accountnot GraphQL Apollo
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat
- Developer plan caps at 10 users and Standard caps at 30 users before requiring the sales-gated Enterprise tier
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- CommunityFree
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- Community support
- Studio Starter$49/monthly
- Apollo Studio
- GraphQL monitoring
- Collaboration
- Studio Professional$399/monthly
- Advanced analytics
- Priority support
- SLA
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full IDE features
- Git integration
- Local storage
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Bruno better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Bruno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Bruno?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Bruno at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Bruno run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Bruno is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Bruno cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apigee
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stoplight
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs 3scale
- GraphQL Apollo vs Akana
- GraphQL Apollo vs Asyncapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs AWS API Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backendless
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Apigee
- Bruno vs KeystoneJS
- Bruno vs Parse Server
- Bruno vs Stoplight
- Bruno vs Strapi
- Bruno vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs WSO2 API Manager
- Bruno vs 3scale
- Bruno vs Akana
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Backendless

