Software · head to head
Google Maps Platform vs Surpac

Google Maps Platform
Software
Comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs that allow developers to embed Google
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Surpac
Software
Geology and mine planning software for all mining methods
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Google Maps Platform free allowances are per service rather than pooled, at 10,000 events a month for dynamic maps, geocoding and autocomplete; Surpac 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
- They diverge on capability: Google Maps Platform covers Core Functionality, Surpac covers Geological database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Google Maps Platform and Surpac actually diverge.
| Attribute | Google Maps Platform | Surpac |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Windows |
| Founded | 2005 | 1981 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Google Maps Platform
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Surpac
- Geological database
- Block modeling
- Mine design
- Resource estimation
- Workflow automation
- MineSched
- PCBC
- Whittle
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Google Maps Platform
- Embedding dynamic maps, Street View and photorealistic 3D tiles in an applicationnot Surpac
- Route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisationnot Surpac
- Geocoding, place autocomplete and address validationnot Surpac
- Environmental data including weather, solar, air quality and pollennot Surpac
- Geospatial analytics through Earth Enginenot Surpac
Surpac
- Geological modelingnot Google Maps Platform
- Mine planningnot Google Maps Platform
- Resource estimationnot Google Maps Platform
- Grade controlnot Google Maps Platform
- Production trackingnot Google Maps Platform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Google Maps Platform
- Free allowances are per service rather than pooled, at 10,000 events a month for dynamic maps, geocoding and autocomplete
- Dynamic Maps cost $7.00 per 1,000 calls at the entry tier
- Geocoding and the Directions API both cost $5.00 per 1,000 calls at the entry tier
- Pricing is tiered by volume, so the effective unit price depends on total monthly usage and is hard to predict in advance
- Billing is usage based with no flat plan, so a traffic spike is a cost spike
Surpac
- 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
Pricing, plan by plan
Google Maps Platform
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Google Maps Platform review.
Surpac
On request- Surpac Core$6000/year
- 3D visualization
- Geological database
- Surface modeling
- Surpac Advanced$12000/year
- Block modeling
- Resource estimation
- Mine design
- Surpac Complete$20000/year
- All modules
- Underground planning
- Scheduling integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Google Maps Platform if
- You need core functionality.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Surpac if
- You need geological database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want block modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is Google Maps Platform or Surpac better?
- Neither clearly leads. Google Maps Platform starts at On request and Surpac at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Google Maps Platform or Surpac?
- Google Maps Platform starts at On request and Surpac at On request.
- Does Google Maps Platform or Surpac run on more platforms?
- Google Maps Platform runs on Web. Surpac runs on Windows.
- What is Google Maps Platform best used for?
- Google Maps Platform is most often used for embedding dynamic maps, street view and photorealistic 3d tiles in an application, route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisation, geocoding, place autocomplete and address validation, environmental data including weather, solar, air quality and pollen. Of those, embedding dynamic maps, street view and photorealistic 3d tiles in an application and route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisation are not what Surpac is typically brought in for.
- What can Google Maps Platform do that Surpac cannot?
- Google Maps Platform covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Surpac covers Geological database, Block modeling, Mine design, Resource estimation.
Related pages
More on Google Maps Platform
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Google Maps Platform vs Mapbox
- Google Maps Platform vs HERE Technologies
- Google Maps Platform vs Apple Maps
- Google Maps Platform vs Leaflet
- Google Maps Platform vs Esri ArcGIS
- Google Maps Platform vs CesiumJS
- Google Maps Platform vs Samsara
- Google Maps Platform vs Bing Maps
- Google Maps Platform vs CARTO
- Google Maps Platform vs Geotab
- Google Maps Platform vs GraphHopper
- Google Maps Platform vs HERE WeGo
- Google Maps Platform vs IndoorAtlas
- Google Maps Platform vs Mappedin
- Google Maps Platform vs Verizon Connect
- Google Maps Platform vs AllTrails
- Google Maps Platform vs Citymapper
- Google Maps Platform vs deck.gl
- Google Maps Platform vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Google Maps Platform vs Leapfrog Geo
- Google Maps Platform vs Deswik Suite
- Google Maps Platform vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Google Maps Platform vs Datamine
- Google Maps Platform vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Google Maps Platform vs Micromine
- Google Maps Platform vs Datamine Studio RM
- Google Maps Platform vs Maptek I-Site
- Google Maps Platform vs Minemax
- Google Maps Platform vs Promine
- Google Maps Platform vs Trimble Mining
- Google Maps Platform vs Vulcan
- Google Maps Platform vs 3DEC
- Google Maps Platform vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Google Maps Platform vs Carlson Mining
- Google Maps Platform vs Cority EHS
- Google Maps Platform vs Enablon EHS
- Surpac vs Mapbox
- Surpac vs HERE Technologies
- Surpac vs Apple Maps
- Surpac vs Leaflet
- Surpac vs Esri ArcGIS
- Surpac vs CesiumJS
- Surpac vs Samsara
- Surpac vs Bing Maps
- Surpac vs CARTO
- Surpac vs Geotab
- Surpac vs GraphHopper
- Surpac vs HERE WeGo
- Surpac vs IndoorAtlas
- Surpac vs Mappedin
- Surpac vs Verizon Connect
- Surpac vs AllTrails
- Surpac vs Citymapper
- Surpac vs deck.gl
- Surpac vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Surpac vs Leapfrog Geo
- Surpac vs Deswik Suite
- Surpac vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Surpac vs Datamine
- Surpac vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Surpac vs Micromine
- Surpac vs Datamine Studio RM
- Surpac vs Maptek I-Site
- Surpac vs Minemax
- Surpac vs Promine
- Surpac vs Trimble Mining
- Surpac vs Vulcan
- Surpac vs 3DEC
- Surpac vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Surpac vs Carlson Mining
- Surpac vs Cority EHS
- Surpac vs Enablon EHS
