Accounting & Finance · head to head
Fyle vs Grasshopper

Fyle
Accounting & Finance
Real-time expense management that works with your cards
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -

Grasshopper
Communication & Collaboration
The entrepreneur's phone system
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fyle billed per active user, defined as anyone who creates an expense or has a connected card with transactions in the month, so headcount does not predict the bill; Grasshopper available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fyle and Grasshopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fyle | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/month | On request |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Web |
| Category | Accounting & Finance | Communication & Collaboration |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fyle
- Real-time card tracking
- Automatic receipt matching
- Expense policies
- Approval workflows
- Mileage tracking
- QuickBooks
- Xero
- Sage Intacct
Only in Grasshopper
Nothing recorded that Fyle does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fyle
- Expense reporting and corporate card reconciliationnot Grasshopper
- Enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursementnot Grasshopper
Grasshopper
No use cases recorded yet. See the Grasshopper review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fyle
- Billed per active user, defined as anyone who creates an expense or has a connected card with transactions in the month, so headcount does not predict the bill
- The Growth plan carries a 5 user minimum and the Business plan a 10 user minimum, so the entry cost is set by the floor rather than the team
- API access and the Sage Intacct and NetSuite integrations require a paid tier
- ACH reimbursements and project expense tracking sit above the entry plan
- Both published plans are billed annually
- Enterprise pricing is custom and aimed at organisations with 250 or more employees
Grasshopper
- Available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
- Plans start at $14/month only under a promotional discount of up to $75 off select plans, meaning the advertised entry price is not the standing rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Fyle
$29/month- Standard$8/month
- Real-time card feeds
- Receipt matching
- Basic approvals
- Business$12/month
- Advanced policies
- Custom workflows
- Analytics
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited users
- API access
- Priority support
Grasshopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Grasshopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fyle if
- You need real-time card tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want automatic receipt matching.
Choose Grasshopper if
Nothing in the data separates Grasshopper from Fyle on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Fyle or Grasshopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fyle starts at $29/month and Grasshopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fyle or Grasshopper?
- Fyle starts at $29/month and Grasshopper at On request.
- Does Fyle or Grasshopper run on more platforms?
- Fyle runs on Web, Ios, Android. Grasshopper runs on Web.
- What is Fyle best used for?
- Fyle is most often used for expense reporting and corporate card reconciliation, enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursement. Of those, expense reporting and corporate card reconciliation and enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursement are not what Grasshopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Fyle do that Grasshopper cannot?
- Fyle covers Real-time card tracking, Automatic receipt matching, Expense policies, Approval workflows.
Related pages
More on Grasshopper
Other head to heads
- Fyle vs QuickBooks
- Fyle vs Ramp
- Fyle vs Airbase
- Fyle vs Melio
- Fyle vs Wise Business
- Fyle vs ADP
- Fyle vs Brex
- Fyle vs Expensify
- Fyle vs Payoneer
- Fyle vs Pleo
- Fyle vs Sage 50
- Fyle vs SAP Concur
- Fyle vs Spendesk
- Fyle vs Stampli
- Fyle vs Tipalti
- Fyle vs Xero
- Fyle vs Zoho Books
- Fyle vs Adyen
- Fyle vs Zoom
- Fyle vs Microsoft Teams
- Fyle vs Loom
- Fyle vs RingCentral Video
- Fyle vs Slack
- Fyle vs Telegram
- Fyle vs Webex by Cisco
- Fyle vs Chanty
- Fyle vs Chatwork
- Fyle vs Flock
- Fyle vs Google Chat
- Fyle vs Lark
- Fyle vs Mattermost
- Fyle vs Quo
- Fyle vs Rocket.Chat
- Fyle vs Signal
- Fyle vs TeamViewer
- Fyle vs Textline
- Grasshopper vs QuickBooks
- Grasshopper vs Ramp
- Grasshopper vs Airbase
- Grasshopper vs Melio
- Grasshopper vs Wise Business
- Grasshopper vs ADP
- Grasshopper vs Brex
- Grasshopper vs Expensify
- Grasshopper vs Payoneer
- Grasshopper vs Pleo
- Grasshopper vs Sage 50
- Grasshopper vs SAP Concur
- Grasshopper vs Spendesk
- Grasshopper vs Stampli
- Grasshopper vs Tipalti
- Grasshopper vs Xero
- Grasshopper vs Zoho Books
- Grasshopper vs Adyen
- Grasshopper vs Zoom
- Grasshopper vs Microsoft Teams
- Grasshopper vs Loom
- Grasshopper vs RingCentral Video
- Grasshopper vs Slack
- Grasshopper vs Telegram
- Grasshopper vs Webex by Cisco
- Grasshopper vs Chanty
- Grasshopper vs Chatwork
- Grasshopper vs Flock
- Grasshopper vs Google Chat
- Grasshopper vs Lark
- Grasshopper vs Mattermost
- Grasshopper vs Quo
- Grasshopper vs Rocket.Chat
- Grasshopper vs Signal
- Grasshopper vs TeamViewer
- Grasshopper vs Textline
