Softwr

Software · head to head

Armory3D vs Fyrox

Armory3D logo

Armory3D

Software

Open-source 3D game engine integrated with Blender

From
Free
Rated
-
Fyrox logo

Fyrox

Software

Feature-rich 3D game engine written in Rust

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Armory3D compiled binaries are sold to fund the project while the source code itself is free to build from scratch; Fyrox licensed under MIT with no commercial or paid tier; the engine is entirely free and open source
  • They diverge on capability: Armory3D covers Blender integration, Fyrox covers Scene editor.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Armory3D and Fyrox actually diverge.

Attributes where Armory3D and Fyrox differ
AttributeArmory3DFyrox
PlatformsWindows, Macos, Linux, Html5, AndroidWindows, Macos, Linux, Webgl
Founded20162019

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Armory3D

  • Blender integration
  • 3D graphics rendering
  • Physics engine (Bullet)
  • Audio system
  • Haxe scripting
  • Particle effects
  • Skeletal animation
  • Material system

Only in Fyrox

  • Scene editor
  • 3D/2D rendering
  • Physics (Rapier)
  • Animation system
  • Sound engine
  • UI framework
  • Navmesh
  • Particle systems

Both cover

  • Local deployment
  • Web deployment
  • Windows support
  • Macos support
  • Linux support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Armory3D

  • 3D game development
  • Blender-based gamesnot Fyrox
  • Web gamesnot Fyrox

Fyrox

  • 3D game development
  • 2D gamesnot Armory3D
  • Simulationnot Armory3D
  • Prototypingnot Armory3D

Both are used for 3d game development, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Armory3D

  • Compiled binaries are sold to fund the project while the source code itself is free to build from scratch

Fyrox

  • Licensed under MIT with no commercial or paid tier; the engine is entirely free and open source

Pricing, plan by plan

Armory3D

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Full engine
    • Blender integration
    • 3D graphics

Fyrox

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full engine access
    • Scene editor
    • Physics integration

Which should you pick?

Choose Armory3D if

  • You need blender integration.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Html5, Android.
  • You also want 3d graphics rendering.

Choose Fyrox if

  • You need scene editor.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Webgl.
  • You also want 3d/2d rendering.

Questions people ask

Is Armory3D or Fyrox better?
Neither clearly leads. Armory3D starts at Free and Fyrox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Armory3D or Fyrox?
Armory3D starts at Free and Fyrox at Free.
Does Armory3D or Fyrox run on more platforms?
Armory3D runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Html5, Android. Fyrox runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Webgl.
Can I use Armory3D for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Armory3D best used for?
Armory3D is most often used for 3d game development, blender-based games, web games. Of those, blender-based games and web games are not what Fyrox is typically brought in for.
What can Armory3D do that Fyrox cannot?
Armory3D covers Blender integration, 3D graphics rendering, Physics engine (Bullet), Audio system. Fyrox covers Scene editor, 3D/2D rendering, Physics (Rapier), Animation system. Both handle Local deployment, Web deployment, Windows support, Macos support.

Related pages

Other head to heads