Software · head to head
Papertrail vs CloudWatch
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Papertrail log Observability starts at $5.00 per GB per month; CloudWatch the free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- They diverge on capability: Papertrail covers Real-time tail, CloudWatch covers Metrics collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Papertrail and CloudWatch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Papertrail | CloudWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | usage-based |
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Papertrail
- Real-time tail
- Saved searches
- System alerts
Only in CloudWatch
- Metrics collection
- Dashboards
- Alarms and notifications
Both cover
- Log aggregation
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Papertrail
- Aggregating syslog and application logs from many hosts into one searchable streamnot CloudWatch
- Tail-and-search style troubleshooting during incidentsnot CloudWatch
- Long-term log archiving to Amazon S3 for later analysisnot CloudWatch
CloudWatch
- Metrics and log collection for AWS workloadsnot Papertrail
- Alarming on thresholds across AWS servicesnot Papertrail
- Querying logs with Logs Insightsnot Papertrail
- Live tailing logs during an incidentnot Papertrail
- Distributed tracing alongside X-Raynot Papertrail
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Papertrail
- Log Observability starts at $5.00 per GB per month
- Usage beyond the plan volume is billed at a 30% higher price per GB and is capped at 200% extra
- Transferred volume is measured as message length plus 50 bytes of metadata per message, so metadata counts against the quota
CloudWatch
- The free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- Custom metrics are $0.30 each for the first 10,000, so instrumenting broadly gets expensive before volume discounts apply
- Each custom dashboard beyond the free three is $3 a month
- Alarms are billed at $0.10 per alarm metric a month, with high-resolution alarms costing more
- Log storage beyond the free 5 GB is $0.03 per GB per month on top of the ingestion charge
Pricing, plan by plan
Papertrail
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Real-time tail
- Saved searches
CloudWatch
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Papertrail if
- You need real-time tail.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want saved searches.
Choose CloudWatch if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want dashboards.
Questions people ask
- Is Papertrail or CloudWatch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Papertrail starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Papertrail or CloudWatch?
- Papertrail starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free.
- Does Papertrail or CloudWatch run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Papertrail for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Papertrail best used for?
- Papertrail is most often used for aggregating syslog and application logs from many hosts into one searchable stream, tail-and-search style troubleshooting during incidents, long-term log archiving to amazon s3 for later analysis. Of those, aggregating syslog and application logs from many hosts into one searchable stream and tail-and-search style troubleshooting during incidents are not what CloudWatch is typically brought in for.
- What can Papertrail do that CloudWatch cannot?
- Papertrail covers Real-time tail, Saved searches, System alerts. CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Dashboards, Alarms and notifications. Both handle Log aggregation, API, Webhooks, REST.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Papertrail vs Elastic Stack
- Papertrail vs New Relic
- Papertrail vs Datadog Logs
- Papertrail vs Coralogix
- Papertrail vs Grafana Loki
- Papertrail vs Dynatrace
- Papertrail vs InfluxDB
- Papertrail vs Airbrake
- Papertrail vs AppDynamics
- Papertrail vs Axiom
- Papertrail vs Azure Monitor
- Papertrail vs Better Stack
- Papertrail vs Bugsnag
- Papertrail vs Dynatrace Logs
- Papertrail vs Elastic
- Papertrail vs Elastic APM
- Papertrail vs Elasticsearch Service
- Papertrail vs ELK Stack
- CloudWatch vs Elastic Stack
- CloudWatch vs New Relic
- CloudWatch vs Datadog Logs
- CloudWatch vs Coralogix
- CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace
- CloudWatch vs InfluxDB
- CloudWatch vs Airbrake
- CloudWatch vs AppDynamics
- CloudWatch vs Axiom
- CloudWatch vs Azure Monitor
- CloudWatch vs Better Stack
- CloudWatch vs Bugsnag
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace Logs
- CloudWatch vs Elastic
- CloudWatch vs Elastic APM
- CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch Service
- CloudWatch vs ELK Stack


