Log Management · head to head
New Relic vs TimescaleDB

TimescaleDB
Database & Data Management
Time-series database built on PostgreSQL for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: New Relic data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult; TimescaleDB inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- They diverge on capability: New Relic covers APM, TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which New Relic and TimescaleDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | New Relic | TimescaleDB |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Api, Mobile | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Category | Log Management | Database & Data Management |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in New Relic
- APM
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Log Management
- Browser Monitoring
- Synthetic Monitoring
- Mobile Monitoring
- Kubernetes Monitoring
- AI Ops
Only in TimescaleDB
- Time-series Optimization
- PostgreSQL Extension
- Automatic Partitioning
- Continuous Aggregates
- Native Compression
- Full SQL Support
- Real-time Analytics
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
New Relic
- Application monitoringnot TimescaleDB
- Infrastructure monitoringnot TimescaleDB
- Error trackingnot TimescaleDB
- Performance optimizationnot TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
- Monitoringnot New Relic
- IoT datanot New Relic
- Financial datanot New Relic
- Log analyticsnot New Relic
- Observabilitynot New Relic
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
New Relic
- Data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- Core user licensing model adds complexity to pricing with distinction between full platform users and basic users
- Default logs obfuscation may miss some sensitive patterns requiring custom configuration
- Retention limits even on paid tiers require additional storage for long-term compliance requirements
TimescaleDB
- Inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- Operational complexity increases significantly at scale, requiring expertise in chunk tuning and autovacuum management
- Bloom filter indexes on compressed columns can return incorrect query results before upgrade
- PostgreSQL 15 support ending June 2026, forcing mandatory upgrades to PostgreSQL 16 or later
Pricing, plan by plan
New Relic
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the New Relic review.
TimescaleDB
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted TimescaleDB
- MIT-licensed core
- Full PostgreSQL compatibility
- Scale Plan (Cloud)$36/month
- Compute and storage charges
- Multi-node HA
- Unlimited VPCs
Which should you pick?
Choose New Relic if
- You need apm.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
- You also want infrastructure monitoring.
Choose TimescaleDB if
- You need time-series optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want postgresql extension.
Questions people ask
- Is New Relic or TimescaleDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. New Relic starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, New Relic or TimescaleDB?
- New Relic starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free.
- Does New Relic or TimescaleDB run on more platforms?
- New Relic runs on Web, Api, Mobile. TimescaleDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use New Relic for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is New Relic best used for?
- New Relic is most often used for application monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, error tracking, performance optimization. Of those, application monitoring and infrastructure monitoring are not what TimescaleDB is typically brought in for.
- What can New Relic do that TimescaleDB cannot?
- New Relic covers APM, Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Browser Monitoring. TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization, PostgreSQL Extension, Automatic Partitioning, Continuous Aggregates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
New Relic: Does New Relic offer a free tier?
Yes, New Relic's free tier is perpetual with no credit card required. It includes 100 GB of free data ingest monthly, one Full Platform User with access to all 50+ capabilities, and unlimited Basic Users for querying and dashboard creation.
SourceTimescaleDB: Is TimescaleDB free?
Yes. TimescaleDB is free and open source under the Timescale License. The managed cloud service offers a free trial with $1,000 in credits expiring in 30 days.
SourceNew Relic: How much does New Relic cost for paid plans?
Paid plans start at $49 per month per core user. New Relic uses consumption-based pricing where you pay only for what you use. Annual commitment options are available with volume discounts for larger teams.
SourceTimescaleDB: What database does TimescaleDB run on top of?
TimescaleDB is a PostgreSQL extension that runs on top of PostgreSQL. You retain full PostgreSQL compatibility including SQL queries, transactions, and ecosystem tools.
SourceNew Relic: What data retention is included in New Relic's free tier?
The free tier includes a minimum of 8 days data retention for troubleshooting. Paid plans offer extended retention periods and customizable data retention policies.
SourceTimescaleDB: How much can TimescaleDB compress data?
TimescaleDB offers transparent columnar compression that can reduce storage by up to 95%. Newer data remains in row-oriented format for fast writes, while older data is automatically compressed to the column store.
SourceNew Relic: How many integrations does New Relic support?
New Relic provides access to 780+ integrations and unlimited hosts at no additional cost. These include monitoring integrations for various cloud services, databases, and applications.
SourceTimescaleDB: Does TimescaleDB require manual partitioning?
No. TimescaleDB handles automatic time-based partitioning through hypertables. Data is automatically chunked based on time intervals, requiring no manual partition management.
SourceNew Relic: Can I use New Relic to monitor multiple cloud providers?
Yes, New Relic is cloud-agnostic and supports monitoring across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and on-premises infrastructure in a single platform.
SourceTimescaleDB: What PostgreSQL versions does TimescaleDB support?
As of October 2025, TimescaleDB requires PostgreSQL 16 or greater. PostgreSQL 15 support will end with the June 2026 release, after which all instances must upgrade to PostgreSQL 16.
SourceNew Relic: What is New Relic's ownership structure today?
New Relic was acquired by TPG and Francisco Partners on July 31, 2023, for $6.5 billion and transitioned from a publicly traded company to a private company in November 2023.
SourceRelated pages
More on TimescaleDB
Other head to heads
- New Relic vs Elastic Stack
- New Relic vs Datadog Logs
- New Relic vs Coralogix
- New Relic vs Grafana Loki
- New Relic vs CloudWatch
- New Relic vs Dynatrace
- New Relic vs InfluxDB
- New Relic vs Airbrake
- New Relic vs AppDynamics
- New Relic vs Axiom
- New Relic vs Azure Monitor
- New Relic vs Better Stack
- New Relic vs Bugsnag
- New Relic vs Dynatrace Logs
- New Relic vs Elastic
- New Relic vs Elastic APM
- New Relic vs Elasticsearch Service
- New Relic vs ELK Stack
- New Relic vs Cockroach Labs
- New Relic vs PostgreSQL
- New Relic vs Airtable
- New Relic vs Amazon Aurora
- New Relic vs Elasticsearch
- New Relic vs PlanetScale
- New Relic vs Azure SQL
- New Relic vs ClickHouse
- New Relic vs Couchbase
- New Relic vs DuckDB
- New Relic vs DynamoDB
- New Relic vs MariaDB
- New Relic vs Oracle Database
- New Relic vs Amazon RDS
- New Relic vs Amazon Redshift
- New Relic vs Apache Druid
- New Relic vs Cassandra
- New Relic vs CouchDB
- TimescaleDB vs Elastic Stack
- TimescaleDB vs Datadog Logs
- TimescaleDB vs Coralogix
- TimescaleDB vs Grafana Loki
- TimescaleDB vs CloudWatch
- TimescaleDB vs Dynatrace
- TimescaleDB vs InfluxDB
- TimescaleDB vs Airbrake
- TimescaleDB vs AppDynamics
- TimescaleDB vs Axiom
- TimescaleDB vs Azure Monitor
- TimescaleDB vs Better Stack
- TimescaleDB vs Bugsnag
- TimescaleDB vs Dynatrace Logs
- TimescaleDB vs Elastic
- TimescaleDB vs Elastic APM
- TimescaleDB vs Elasticsearch Service
- TimescaleDB vs ELK Stack
- TimescaleDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TimescaleDB vs PostgreSQL
- TimescaleDB vs Airtable
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Aurora
- TimescaleDB vs Elasticsearch
- TimescaleDB vs PlanetScale
- TimescaleDB vs Azure SQL
- TimescaleDB vs ClickHouse
- TimescaleDB vs Couchbase
- TimescaleDB vs DuckDB
- TimescaleDB vs DynamoDB
- TimescaleDB vs MariaDB
- TimescaleDB vs Oracle Database
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon RDS
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Druid
- TimescaleDB vs Cassandra
- TimescaleDB vs CouchDB

