Software · head to head
Loki vs Bugsnag
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention; Bugsnag owned by SmartBear rather than being independent
- They diverge on capability: Loki covers Log aggregation, Bugsnag covers Error tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loki and Bugsnag actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Only in Bugsnag
- Error tracking
- Crash reporting
- Release tracking
- Trend analysis
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Bugsnag
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Bugsnag
Bugsnag
- Crash and error reporting for mobile and web applicationsnot Loki
- Stability scores per releasenot Loki
- Grouping errors by root cause across deploysnot Loki
- Alerting when a release regressesnot Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Bugsnag
- Owned by SmartBear rather than being independent
- The free tier covers 7,500 events a month
- Paid tiers are usage-priced by event volume rather than by seat, so a noisy release raises the bill
- Enterprise pricing is quote-only
Pricing, plan by plan
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Bugsnag
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Crash reporting
- Release tracking
Which should you pick?
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Bugsnag if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want crash reporting.
Questions people ask
- Is Loki or Bugsnag better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loki starts at Free and Bugsnag at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loki or Bugsnag?
- Loki starts at Free and Bugsnag at Free.
- Does Loki or Bugsnag run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Loki best used for?
- Loki is most often used for aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing, querying logs alongside metrics in grafana. Of those, aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing and querying logs alongside metrics in grafana are not what Bugsnag is typically brought in for.
- What can Loki do that Bugsnag cannot?
- Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Bugsnag covers Error tracking, Crash reporting, Release tracking, Trend analysis. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Grafana Loki
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Elastic
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Loki vs ELK Stack
- Bugsnag vs Elastic Stack
- Bugsnag vs New Relic
- Bugsnag vs Datadog Logs
- Bugsnag vs Coralogix
- Bugsnag vs Grafana Loki
- Bugsnag vs CloudWatch
- Bugsnag vs Dynatrace
- Bugsnag vs InfluxDB
- Bugsnag vs Airbrake
- Bugsnag vs AppDynamics
- Bugsnag vs Axiom
- Bugsnag vs Azure Monitor
- Bugsnag vs Better Stack
- Bugsnag vs Dynatrace Logs
- Bugsnag vs Elastic
- Bugsnag vs Elastic APM
- Bugsnag vs Elasticsearch Service
- Bugsnag vs ELK Stack


