Software · head to head
Kong vs MuleSoft Anypoint

Kong
Software
Cloud-native API gateway and service connectivity platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

MuleSoft Anypoint
Software
Integration platform enabling API-led connectivity and end-to-end integration across systems
- From
- $2000/monthly
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; MuleSoft Anypoint listed on UK G-Cloud at £69,200 per unit per year for the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform (Public Sector), via reseller Open Answers Limited
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers Authentication & Authorization, MuleSoft Anypoint covers Integration Flows.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and MuleSoft Anypoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong | MuleSoft Anypoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2000/monthly |
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Cloud, Hybrid, On-premise |
| Founded | 2010 | 2006 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
- Docker support
Only in MuleSoft Anypoint
- Integration Flows
- Data Transformation
- 500+ pre-built connectors
- Custom connectors
- Webhooks
- API management
- Cloud support
- Hybrid support
Both cover
- API Gateway
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- Running an API gateway in front of internal and public servicesnot MuleSoft Anypoint
- Publishing and governing APIs through a developer portalnot MuleSoft Anypoint
MuleSoft Anypoint
- API Developmentnot Kong
- API Gatewaynot Kong
- API Testingnot Kong
- API Documentationnot Kong
- Microservicesnot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
MuleSoft Anypoint
- Listed on UK G-Cloud at £69,200 per unit per year for the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform (Public Sector), via reseller Open Answers Limited
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- CommunityFree
- Core API gateway
- Community support
- Enterprise$undefined/monthly
- Advanced features
- Priority support
- SLA
MuleSoft Anypoint
$2000/monthly- Integration Developer$2000/monthly
- API design
- Integration flows
- Connectors
- Professional$5000/monthly
- Advanced features
- Priority support
- SLA
- Enterprise$undefined/monthly
- Custom solutions
- Dedicated support
- Premium SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need authentication & authorization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want rate limiting.
Choose MuleSoft Anypoint if
- You need integration flows.
- You work on Cloud, Hybrid, On-premise.
- You also want data transformation.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or MuleSoft Anypoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and MuleSoft Anypoint at $2000/monthly, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or MuleSoft Anypoint?
- Kong has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Kong and $2000/monthly for MuleSoft Anypoint.
- Does Kong or MuleSoft Anypoint run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. MuleSoft Anypoint runs on Cloud, Hybrid, On-premise.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Yes. Kong has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. MuleSoft Anypoint starts at $2000/monthly.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for running an api gateway in front of internal and public services, publishing and governing apis through a developer portal. Of those, running an api gateway in front of internal and public services and publishing and governing apis through a developer portal are not what MuleSoft Anypoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that MuleSoft Anypoint cannot?
- Kong covers Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes, Consul. MuleSoft Anypoint covers Integration Flows, Data Transformation, 500+ pre-built connectors, Custom connectors. Both handle API Gateway.
Related pages
More on MuleSoft Anypoint
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Apigee
- Kong vs Bruno
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Parse Server
- Kong vs Stoplight
- Kong vs Strapi
- Kong vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong vs Thunder Client
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Asyncapi
- Kong vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Appwrite
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Hasura
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs PocketBase
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Sanity
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Apigee
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Bruno
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs KeystoneJS
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Parse Server
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Stoplight
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Strapi
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Thunder Client
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs WSO2 API Manager
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs 3scale
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Akana
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Asyncapi
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs AWS API Gateway
- MuleSoft Anypoint vs Microsoft Azure API Management
