API Management · head to head
Kong vs Akana

Kong
API Management
Cloud-native API gateway and service connectivity platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Akana
API Management
Enterprise API lifecycle management platform
- From
- $2500/monthly
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Akana owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Akana covers API Lifecycle Management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Akana actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in Akana
- API Lifecycle Management
- API Security
- Governance Controls
- OAuth
- SAML
- LDAP
- Active Directory
- Cloud support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- Running an API gateway in front of internal and public servicesnot Akana
- Publishing and governing APIs through a developer portalnot Akana
Akana
- API lifecycle management across REST, SOAP and GraphQLnot Kong
- Applying OAuth, JWT and SAML policies at the gatewaynot Kong
- Running the same platform on-premises, in Kubernetes or across cloudsnot Kong
- Developer portal and API monetisationnot Kong
- Monitoring API traffic and enforcing quotasnot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Akana
- Owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
- Pricing is not published; only a 30 day trial is offered
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- CommunityFree
- Core API gateway
- Community support
- Enterprise$undefined/monthly
- Advanced features
- Priority support
- SLA
Akana
$2500/monthly- Professional$2500/monthly
- API Gateway
- Developer Portal
- Basic analytics
- Enterprise$5000/monthly
- Advanced governance
- Multi-cloud support
- Premium support
- Custom$undefined/monthly
- Custom solutions
- Dedicated support
- SLA guarantee
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Akana if
- You need api lifecycle management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
- You also want api security.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Akana better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Akana at $2500/monthly, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Akana?
- Kong has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Kong and $2500/monthly for Akana.
- Does Kong or Akana run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Akana runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Yes. Kong has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akana starts at $2500/monthly.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for running an api gateway in front of internal and public services, publishing and governing apis through a developer portal. Of those, running an api gateway in front of internal and public services and publishing and governing apis through a developer portal are not what Akana is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Akana cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, API Security, Governance Controls, OAuth.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Apigee
- Kong vs Bruno
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Parse Server
- Kong vs Stoplight
- Kong vs Strapi
- Kong vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong vs Thunder Client
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Asyncapi
- Kong vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Kong vs Backendless
- Akana vs Appwrite
- Akana vs Hasura
- Akana vs PocketBase
- Akana vs Sanity
- Akana vs Apigee
- Akana vs Bruno
- Akana vs KeystoneJS
- Akana vs Parse Server
- Akana vs Stoplight
- Akana vs Strapi
- Akana vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Akana vs Thunder Client
- Akana vs WSO2 API Manager
- Akana vs 3scale
- Akana vs Asyncapi
- Akana vs AWS API Gateway
- Akana vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Akana vs Backendless
