Technology · head to head
Greenhouse vs Keycloak

Keycloak
Open Source
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Keycloak has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and Keycloak actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greenhouse | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API |
| Category | Technology | Open Source |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Greenhouse does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot Keycloak
- AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Greenhouse
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Greenhouse
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Greenhouse
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Greenhouse
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Greenhouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Greenhouse or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Keycloak?
- Keycloak has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Greenhouse and Free for Keycloak.
- Does Greenhouse or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Yes. Keycloak has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is Greenhouse best used for?
- Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Greenhouse do that Keycloak cannot?
- Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs PyCharm
- Greenhouse vs Sketch
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Netlify
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Coda
- Greenhouse vs Dashlane
- Greenhouse vs GitHub
- Greenhouse vs Penpot
- Greenhouse vs Debian
- Greenhouse vs Fedora
- Greenhouse vs Ubuntu
- Keycloak vs Asana
- Keycloak vs ClickUp
- Keycloak vs Figma
- Keycloak vs Linear
- Keycloak vs Monday.com
- Keycloak vs Notion
- Keycloak vs Amplitude
- Keycloak vs Datadog
- Keycloak vs PostHog
- Keycloak vs PyCharm
- Keycloak vs Sketch
- Keycloak vs Docker
- Keycloak vs Netlify
- Keycloak vs Okta
- Keycloak vs Aha!
- Keycloak vs Coda
- Keycloak vs Dashlane
- Keycloak vs GitHub
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Debian
- Keycloak vs Fedora
- Keycloak vs Ubuntu

