Software · head to head
Heroku vs Traefik
The short version
- Only Traefik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Traefik requires Kubernetes or container knowledge
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Traefik covers API Gateway.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Traefik actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Traefik
- API Gateway
- Load Balancing
- SSL/TLS Termination
- Kubernetes
- Docker
- Consul
- etcd
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Traefik
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Traefik
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Traefik
Traefik
- API gateway for microservices architecturenot Heroku
- Kubernetes ingress controllernot Heroku
- Container and VM traffic routingnot Heroku
- Cloud-native application managementnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Traefik
- Requires Kubernetes or container knowledge
- Complex configuration for advanced features
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Traefik
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Traefik review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Traefik if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud.
- You also want load balancing.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Traefik better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and Traefik at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Traefik?
- Traefik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for Traefik.
- Does Heroku or Traefik run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Traefik runs on Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud.
- Can I use Traefik for free?
- Yes. Traefik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what Traefik is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Traefik cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Traefik covers API Gateway, Load Balancing, SSL/TLS Termination, Kubernetes.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Prometheus
- Heroku vs Cloudflare
- Heroku vs Consul
- Heroku vs Grafana
- Heroku vs Ivanti
- Heroku vs Palo Alto Networks
- Heroku vs Splunk
- Heroku vs Tailscale
- Heroku vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Traefik vs Grafana Cloud
- Traefik vs Neon
- Traefik vs DigitalOcean
- Traefik vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Traefik vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Traefik vs Deno Deploy
- Traefik vs Hetzner Cloud
- Traefik vs Linode
- Traefik vs Packer
- Traefik vs Pulumi
- Traefik vs Render
- Traefik vs Upstash
- Traefik vs Vagrant
- Traefik vs Vultr
- Traefik vs Akamai
- Traefik vs Alibaba Cloud
- Traefik vs Chef
- Traefik vs Contabo
- Traefik vs Prometheus
- Traefik vs Cloudflare
- Traefik vs Consul
- Traefik vs Grafana
- Traefik vs Ivanti
- Traefik vs Palo Alto Networks
- Traefik vs Splunk
- Traefik vs Tailscale
- Traefik vs Ubiquiti UniFi


