Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Hetzner Cloud vs Traefik

Hetzner Cloud
Cloud & Infrastructure
Affordable cloud servers in Europe
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Traefik
Network & Connectivity
Modern cloud-native edge router and API gateway
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hetzner Cloud cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable; Traefik requires Kubernetes or container knowledge
- They diverge on capability: Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Traefik covers API Gateway.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hetzner Cloud and Traefik actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hetzner Cloud | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cli | Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud |
| Category | Cloud & Infrastructure | Network & Connectivity |
| Founded | 1997 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hetzner Cloud
- Cloud servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Networks
- Firewalls
- Floating IPs
- Backups
Only in Traefik
- API Gateway
- Load Balancing
- SSL/TLS Termination
- Consul
- etcd
- Linux support
- Docker support
- Kubernetes support
Both cover
- Docker
- Kubernetes
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hetzner Cloud
- Low-cost virtual servers for development and testingnot Traefik
- European hosting with data held in Germany or Finlandnot Traefik
- Workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic mattersnot Traefik
- Self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalersnot Traefik
Traefik
- API gateway for microservices architecturenot Hetzner Cloud
- Kubernetes ingress controllernot Hetzner Cloud
- Container and VM traffic routingnot Hetzner Cloud
- Cloud-native application managementnot Hetzner Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hetzner Cloud
- Cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable
- The shared-resource tiers are positioned for variable usage and development rather than sustained production workloads
- Regions are limited to Germany, Finland, the United States and Singapore, so latency to other markets is a real constraint
- The uptime guarantee is 99.9 percent, below what the large hyperscalers offer on comparable services
- Support is 24/7 by email, without a phone channel
Traefik
- Requires Kubernetes or container knowledge
- Complex configuration for advanced features
Pricing, plan by plan
Hetzner Cloud
Free- CX11$3.29/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- 25GB SSD
- CX21$6.59/month
- 2 vCPU
- 4GB RAM
- 40GB SSD
Traefik
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Traefik review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Hetzner Cloud if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want block storage.
Choose Traefik if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud.
- You also want load balancing.
Questions people ask
- Is Hetzner Cloud or Traefik better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Traefik at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hetzner Cloud or Traefik?
- Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Traefik at Free.
- Does Hetzner Cloud or Traefik run on more platforms?
- Hetzner Cloud runs on Web, Api, Cli. Traefik runs on Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud.
- Can I use Hetzner Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hetzner Cloud best used for?
- Hetzner Cloud is most often used for low-cost virtual servers for development and testing, european hosting with data held in germany or finland, workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic matters, self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalers. Of those, low-cost virtual servers for development and testing and european hosting with data held in germany or finland are not what Traefik is typically brought in for.
- What can Hetzner Cloud do that Traefik cannot?
- Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Block storage, Object storage, Load balancers. Traefik covers API Gateway, Load Balancing, SSL/TLS Termination, Consul. Both handle Docker, Kubernetes.
Related pages
More on Hetzner Cloud
Other head to heads
- Hetzner Cloud vs Grafana Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Neon
- Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- Hetzner Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Deno Deploy
- Hetzner Cloud vs Heroku
- Hetzner Cloud vs Linode
- Hetzner Cloud vs Packer
- Hetzner Cloud vs Pulumi
- Hetzner Cloud vs Render
- Hetzner Cloud vs Upstash
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vagrant
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vultr
- Hetzner Cloud vs Akamai
- Hetzner Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Chef
- Hetzner Cloud vs Contabo
- Hetzner Cloud vs Prometheus
- Hetzner Cloud vs Cloudflare
- Hetzner Cloud vs Consul
- Hetzner Cloud vs Grafana
- Hetzner Cloud vs Ivanti
- Hetzner Cloud vs Palo Alto Networks
- Hetzner Cloud vs Splunk
- Hetzner Cloud vs Tailscale
- Hetzner Cloud vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Traefik vs Grafana Cloud
- Traefik vs Neon
- Traefik vs DigitalOcean
- Traefik vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Traefik vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Traefik vs Deno Deploy
- Traefik vs Heroku
- Traefik vs Linode
- Traefik vs Packer
- Traefik vs Pulumi
- Traefik vs Render
- Traefik vs Upstash
- Traefik vs Vagrant
- Traefik vs Vultr
- Traefik vs Akamai
- Traefik vs Alibaba Cloud
- Traefik vs Chef
- Traefik vs Contabo
- Traefik vs Prometheus
- Traefik vs Cloudflare
- Traefik vs Consul
- Traefik vs Grafana
- Traefik vs Ivanti
- Traefik vs Palo Alto Networks
- Traefik vs Splunk
- Traefik vs Tailscale
- Traefik vs Ubiquiti UniFi
