Softwr

Software · head to head

Greenhouse vs Razorpay

Greenhouse logo

Greenhouse

Software

Hiring software for growing companies

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
R

Razorpay

Software

Accept, process and disburse payments with India's leading payments platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; Razorpay international card payments cost up to 3% per transaction versus 2% domestically, per razorpay.com/pricing (Aug 2026), and an 18% GST is added on top of the platform fee

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and Razorpay actually diverge.

Attributes where Greenhouse and Razorpay differ
AttributeGreenhouseRazorpay
Pricing modelquotetransaction
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking
  • Interview scheduling
  • Scorecard system
  • Job board posting
  • Candidate CRM
  • Reporting & analytics
  • Offer management
  • EEO compliance

Only in Razorpay

Nothing recorded that Greenhouse does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot Razorpay
  • AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot Razorpay

Razorpay

No use cases recorded yet. See the Razorpay review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Greenhouse

  • Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
  • Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
  • Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
  • Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
  • Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
  • Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox

Razorpay

  • International card payments cost up to 3% per transaction versus 2% domestically, per razorpay.com/pricing (Aug 2026), and an 18% GST is added on top of the platform fee
  • Instant refunds cost between Rs. 7.99 and Rs. 14.99 per refund on top of the transaction fee, per Razorpay's own pricing page; standard refunds are free but instant ones are not

Pricing, plan by plan

Greenhouse

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.

Razorpay

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Razorpay review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Greenhouse if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want interview scheduling.
Greenhouse review

Choose Razorpay if

Nothing in the data separates Razorpay from Greenhouse on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Razorpay review

Questions people ask

Is Greenhouse or Razorpay better?
Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and Razorpay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Razorpay?
Greenhouse starts at On request and Razorpay at On request.
Does Greenhouse or Razorpay run on more platforms?
Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Razorpay runs on Web.
What is Greenhouse best used for?
Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what Razorpay is typically brought in for.
What can Greenhouse do that Razorpay cannot?
Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Greenhouse

More on Razorpay

Keep looking

Other head to heads