Software · head to head
Leaflet vs Maptek I-Site

Leaflet
Software
Leading open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps, used by millions of developers worldwide
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Maptek I-Site
Software
3D laser scanning and point cloud processing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Leaflet has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Leaflet 2D only with no support for 3D features, tilt, or rotation; Maptek I-Site the workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
- They diverge on capability: Leaflet covers Core Functionality, Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Leaflet and Maptek I-Site actually diverge.
| Attribute | Leaflet | Maptek I-Site |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 1981 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Leaflet
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Maptek I-Site
- Point cloud processing
- 3D model creation
- Pit wall monitoring
- Stockpile measurement
- Change detection
- Vulcan
- CAD systems
- GIS platforms
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Leaflet
- Embedding interactive maps in a web pagenot Maptek I-Site
- Mobile-friendly map interfaces across desktop and mobile browsersnot Maptek I-Site
- Mapping where bundle size matters, at roughly 42 KB of JavaScriptnot Maptek I-Site
- Extending a basic map with plugins rather than adopting a full platformnot Maptek I-Site
Maptek I-Site
- Laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workingsnot Leaflet
- Geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopesnot Leaflet
- Volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud datanot Leaflet
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Leaflet
- 2D only with no support for 3D features, tilt, or rotation
- Performance degrades when rendering large datasets of complex vector geometries without optimization
- Limited dynamic styling support; style is fixed on the server when using raster tiles
- Lacks native support for WMS features; requires plugins like Leaflet.WMS and complex feature identification is cumbersome
- Requires external tile service for map imagery; does not provide map tiles natively
Maptek I-Site
- The workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
- Scanner range is fixed per model, at 1,000 m for the NS4, 2,800 m for the XR3, 1,200 m for the XR3-D and 3,500 m for the UR3, so range upgrades mean buying different hardware
- No price, licence type or subscription term is published; the page offers only a spec sheet request and a contact form
Pricing, plan by plan
Leaflet
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Leaflet review.
Maptek I-Site
On request- I-Site Studio$11000/year
- Point cloud processing
- 3D modeling
- Pit wall analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose Leaflet if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Maptek I-Site if
- You need point cloud processing.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want 3d model creation.
Questions people ask
- Is Leaflet or Maptek I-Site better?
- Neither clearly leads. Leaflet starts at Free and Maptek I-Site at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Leaflet or Maptek I-Site?
- Leaflet has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Leaflet and On request for Maptek I-Site.
- Does Leaflet or Maptek I-Site run on more platforms?
- Leaflet runs on Web. Maptek I-Site runs on Windows.
- Can I use Leaflet for free?
- Yes. Leaflet has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Maptek I-Site starts at On request.
- What is Leaflet best used for?
- Leaflet is most often used for embedding interactive maps in a web page, mobile-friendly map interfaces across desktop and mobile browsers, mapping where bundle size matters, at roughly 42 kb of javascript, extending a basic map with plugins rather than adopting a full platform. Of those, embedding interactive maps in a web page and mobile-friendly map interfaces across desktop and mobile browsers are not what Maptek I-Site is typically brought in for.
- What can Leaflet do that Maptek I-Site cannot?
- Leaflet covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, 3D model creation, Pit wall monitoring, Stockpile measurement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Leaflet: Is Leaflet free and open source?
Yes. Leaflet is open-source JavaScript library licensed for free use. Over 400 plugins add capabilities like marker clustering, heatmaps, drawing tools, geocoding, and routing.
SourceLeaflet: How do I include Leaflet in my project via CDN?
Leaflet is available on multiple free CDNs including unpkg, cdnjs, and jsDelivr. Include the CSS stylesheet from https://unpkg.com/leaflet@1.9.4/dist/leaflet.css and JavaScript from https://unpkg.com/leaflet@1.9.4/dist/leaflet.js in your HTML head.
SourceLeaflet: What mapping services does Leaflet support?
Leaflet integrates seamlessly with various mapping services including OpenStreetMap, Google Maps, Bing, and other custom tile providers, allowing developers to choose the best base layer.
SourceLeaflet: What is the file size of Leaflet?
Leaflet weighs about 42 KB of JavaScript.
SourceRelated pages
More on Maptek I-Site
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Leaflet vs Mapbox
- Leaflet vs Google Maps Platform
- Leaflet vs HERE Technologies
- Leaflet vs Apple Maps
- Leaflet vs Esri ArcGIS
- Leaflet vs CesiumJS
- Leaflet vs Samsara
- Leaflet vs Bing Maps
- Leaflet vs CARTO
- Leaflet vs Geotab
- Leaflet vs GraphHopper
- Leaflet vs HERE WeGo
- Leaflet vs IndoorAtlas
- Leaflet vs Mappedin
- Leaflet vs Verizon Connect
- Leaflet vs AllTrails
- Leaflet vs Citymapper
- Leaflet vs deck.gl
- Leaflet vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Leaflet vs Leapfrog Geo
- Leaflet vs Deswik Suite
- Leaflet vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Leaflet vs Datamine
- Leaflet vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Leaflet vs Micromine
- Leaflet vs Datamine Studio RM
- Leaflet vs Minemax
- Leaflet vs Promine
- Leaflet vs Surpac
- Leaflet vs Trimble Mining
- Leaflet vs Vulcan
- Leaflet vs 3DEC
- Leaflet vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Leaflet vs Carlson Mining
- Leaflet vs Cority EHS
- Leaflet vs Enablon EHS
- Maptek I-Site vs Mapbox
- Maptek I-Site vs Google Maps Platform
- Maptek I-Site vs HERE Technologies
- Maptek I-Site vs Apple Maps
- Maptek I-Site vs Esri ArcGIS
- Maptek I-Site vs CesiumJS
- Maptek I-Site vs Samsara
- Maptek I-Site vs Bing Maps
- Maptek I-Site vs CARTO
- Maptek I-Site vs Geotab
- Maptek I-Site vs GraphHopper
- Maptek I-Site vs HERE WeGo
- Maptek I-Site vs IndoorAtlas
- Maptek I-Site vs Mappedin
- Maptek I-Site vs Verizon Connect
- Maptek I-Site vs AllTrails
- Maptek I-Site vs Citymapper
- Maptek I-Site vs deck.gl
- Maptek I-Site vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Maptek I-Site vs Leapfrog Geo
- Maptek I-Site vs Deswik Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine
- Maptek I-Site vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Micromine
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine Studio RM
- Maptek I-Site vs Minemax
- Maptek I-Site vs Promine
- Maptek I-Site vs Surpac
- Maptek I-Site vs Trimble Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Vulcan
- Maptek I-Site vs 3DEC
- Maptek I-Site vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Carlson Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Cority EHS
- Maptek I-Site vs Enablon EHS
