Game Development · head to head
CryEngine vs Quixel Mixer

CryEngine
Game Development
Build worlds, break limits. Professional game development engine.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CryEngine a royalty of 5% of Gross Receipts is payable to Crytek on every game built with CRYENGINE; Quixel Mixer discontinued as of February 19, 2026 with no future updates or support
- They diverge on capability: CryEngine covers Advanced graphics, Quixel Mixer covers Material blending.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CryEngine and Quixel Mixer actually diverge.
| Attribute | CryEngine | Quixel Mixer |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Playstation, Xbox, Linux | Windows, macOS |
| Founded | 1999 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Game Development).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CryEngine
- Advanced graphics
- Physics engine
- AI system
- Animation tools
- Flow Graph visual scripting
- C++ and Lua support
- Entity component system
- Sandbox editor
Only in Quixel Mixer
- Material blending
- Megascans integration
- Smart materials
- Procedural tools
- 3D painting
- UDIM support
- Real-time preview
- Export presets
Both cover
- Local deployment
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CryEngine
- Building photorealistic first person and open world games with real time global illuminationnot Quixel Mixer
- Developing with full engine source code accessnot Quixel Mixer
- Sandbox based level design with what you see is what you get exportnot Quixel Mixer
Quixel Mixer
- Game texturesnot CryEngine
- Environment artnot CryEngine
- Photorealistic materialsnot CryEngine
- Film VFXnot CryEngine
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CryEngine
- A royalty of 5% of Gross Receipts is payable to Crytek on every game built with CRYENGINE
- Royalties are waived only on the first USD 5,000.00 of Gross Receipts per year per game
- Royalties are calculated at source on gross receipts before any publisher or platform deductions, so a developer receiving 70% of USD 100,000 still owes USD 4,750
- Military projects, gambling, simulation, science, architecture and serious games are excluded from the standard licence and are not covered as Games
- The licence forbids combining CRYENGINE with code from other game engine providers
- Supported platforms are limited to those Crytek announces at its sole discretion, listed in the agreement as Windows, Linux, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One
- Support is only provided against payment of a separate Support Fee that Crytek may change at its sole discretion
- Crytek may modify the licence agreement at any time, with the only remedy for disagreement being to stop using CRYENGINE
Quixel Mixer
- Discontinued as of February 19, 2026 with no future updates or support
- No built-in baker functionality unlike Substance 3D Painter
- Limited customization compared to industry-standard Substance Painter
- Megascans asset library now requires paid subscription instead of free access
Pricing, plan by plan
CryEngine
Free- FreeFree
- Full engine access
- Source code
- Asset library
Quixel Mixer
Free- FreeFree
- Full feature set
- Megascans integration
- Commercial use
Which should you pick?
Choose CryEngine if
- You need advanced graphics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Playstation, Xbox, Linux.
- You also want physics engine.
Choose Quixel Mixer if
- You need material blending.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS.
- You also want megascans integration.
Questions people ask
- Is CryEngine or Quixel Mixer better?
- Neither clearly leads. CryEngine starts at Free and Quixel Mixer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CryEngine or Quixel Mixer?
- CryEngine starts at Free and Quixel Mixer at Free.
- Does CryEngine or Quixel Mixer run on more platforms?
- CryEngine runs on Windows, Playstation, Xbox, Linux. Quixel Mixer runs on Windows, macOS.
- Can I use CryEngine for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CryEngine best used for?
- CryEngine is most often used for building photorealistic first person and open world games with real time global illumination, developing with full engine source code access, sandbox based level design with what you see is what you get export. Of those, building photorealistic first person and open world games with real time global illumination and developing with full engine source code access are not what Quixel Mixer is typically brought in for.
- What can CryEngine do that Quixel Mixer cannot?
- CryEngine covers Advanced graphics, Physics engine, AI system, Animation tools. Quixel Mixer covers Material blending, Megascans integration, Smart materials, Procedural tools. Both handle Local deployment, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Quixel Mixer: Is Quixel Mixer still available?
Quixel Mixer was discontinued on February 19, 2026. The final version 2023.1 is available for free download from the Epic Games launcher. It runs offline indefinitely but will receive no future updates or support.
SourceQuixel Mixer: Can Quixel Mixer work offline?
Yes, version 2023.1 enables Quixel Mixer to run completely offline. Users can download and use the software offline indefinitely, though without future updates.
SourceQuixel Mixer: What is the current status of Megascans free access?
Quixel Megascans is no longer free for Unreal Engine users. Starting in 2025, Megascans assets are sold individually or included in Fab subscription tiers. The free-for-Unreal era ended at the close of 2024.
SourceQuixel Mixer: How does Quixel Mixer compare to Substance Painter?
Quixel Mixer excels for simplicity, photorealism, and Unreal Engine integration, but lacks a built-in baker unlike Substance 3D Painter. Substance Painter offers more customization and is an industry standard, while Mixer focused on streamlined PBR material creation.
SourceRelated pages
More on Quixel Mixer
Other head to heads
- CryEngine vs DragonBones
- CryEngine vs Unity
- CryEngine vs Aseprite
- CryEngine vs Godot Engine
- CryEngine vs Cascadeur
- CryEngine vs Construct 3
- CryEngine vs GameMaker Studio 2
- CryEngine vs Mixamo
- CryEngine vs Pico-8
- CryEngine vs Substance 3D Painter
- CryEngine vs Adventure Game Studio
- CryEngine vs AppGameKit
- CryEngine vs Armory3D
- CryEngine vs Bevy
- CryEngine vs Buildbox
- CryEngine vs Clickteam Fusion
- CryEngine vs Cocos2d-x
- CryEngine vs Defold
- Quixel Mixer vs DragonBones
- Quixel Mixer vs Unity
- Quixel Mixer vs Aseprite
- Quixel Mixer vs Godot Engine
- Quixel Mixer vs Cascadeur
- Quixel Mixer vs Construct 3
- Quixel Mixer vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Quixel Mixer vs Mixamo
- Quixel Mixer vs Pico-8
- Quixel Mixer vs Substance 3D Painter
- Quixel Mixer vs Adventure Game Studio
- Quixel Mixer vs AppGameKit
- Quixel Mixer vs Armory3D
- Quixel Mixer vs Bevy
- Quixel Mixer vs Buildbox
- Quixel Mixer vs Clickteam Fusion
- Quixel Mixer vs Cocos2d-x
- Quixel Mixer vs Defold

