Weather & Environment · head to head
Climate FieldView vs INTTRA

Climate FieldView
Weather & Environment
Digital agriculture platform for data-driven farming
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

INTTRA
Maritime & Shipping
Ocean shipping network platform
- From
- $0.5/per-transaction
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Climate FieldView has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Climate FieldView the Plus plan starts at $649 per year and is billed annually; INTTRA iNTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform
- They diverge on capability: Climate FieldView covers Real-time data collection, INTTRA covers Electronic booking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Climate FieldView and INTTRA actually diverge.
| Attribute | Climate FieldView | INTTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $0.5/per-transaction |
| Pricing model | subscription | transaction |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web, Api |
| Category | Weather & Environment | Maritime & Shipping |
| Founded | 2006 | 2000 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Climate FieldView
- Real-time data collection
- Field health imagery
- Yield analysis
- Variable rate seeding
- Nitrogen management
- Equipment connectivity
- Manual scouting tools
- Data sharing & connectivity
Only in INTTRA
- Electronic booking
- Container tracking
- Documentation
- Rate management
- TMS platforms
- ERP systems
- Carrier systems
- Api support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Climate FieldView
- Collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinerynot INTTRA
- Building variable rate seeding prescriptionsnot INTTRA
- Field scouting with satellite imagery and field health mapsnot INTTRA
INTTRA
No use cases recorded yet. See the INTTRA review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Climate FieldView
- The Plus plan starts at $649 per year and is billed annually
- The free Basic plan lists only Online Support and a Data Inbox as its included features
- Collecting in-cab data requires buying the FieldView Drive hardware separately
- The vendor states the plan content is subject to change and will be updated regularly
INTTRA
- INTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Climate FieldView
Free- FieldView DriveFree
- Data collection & storage
- Basic field mapping
- Equipment connectivity
- FieldView Plus$4/acre/year
- Everything in Drive
- Field health imagery
- Scouting with drop pins
- FieldView Pro$10/acre/year
- Everything in Plus
- Seed scripting
- Nitrogen advisor
INTTRA
$0.5/per-transaction- Enterprise$1000/month
- E-booking
- Tracking
- Documentation
Which should you pick?
Choose Climate FieldView if
- You need real-time data collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want field health imagery.
Choose INTTRA if
- You need electronic booking.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want container tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Climate FieldView or INTTRA better?
- Neither clearly leads. Climate FieldView starts at Free and INTTRA at $0.5/per-transaction, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Climate FieldView or INTTRA?
- Climate FieldView has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Climate FieldView and $0.5/per-transaction for INTTRA.
- Does Climate FieldView or INTTRA run on more platforms?
- Climate FieldView runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. INTTRA runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Climate FieldView for free?
- Yes. Climate FieldView has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. INTTRA starts at $0.5/per-transaction.
- What is Climate FieldView best used for?
- Climate FieldView is most often used for collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinery, building variable rate seeding prescriptions, field scouting with satellite imagery and field health maps. Of those, collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinery and building variable rate seeding prescriptions are not what INTTRA is typically brought in for.
- What can Climate FieldView do that INTTRA cannot?
- Climate FieldView covers Real-time data collection, Field health imagery, Yield analysis, Variable rate seeding. INTTRA covers Electronic booking, Container tracking, Documentation, Rate management. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
More on Climate FieldView
Other head to heads
- Climate FieldView vs AccuWeather
- Climate FieldView vs MyRadar
- Climate FieldView vs The Weather Channel
- Climate FieldView vs WeatherBug
- Climate FieldView vs RadarScope
- Climate FieldView vs Apple Weather (Dark Sky)
- Climate FieldView vs Baron Weather
- Climate FieldView vs Carrot Weather
- Climate FieldView vs DTN Weather
- Climate FieldView vs Foreca
- Climate FieldView vs MeteoGroup
- Climate FieldView vs OpenWeatherMap
- Climate FieldView vs Aeris Weather
- Climate FieldView vs Airveda
- Climate FieldView vs Ambient Weather Network
- Climate FieldView vs Awair
- Climate FieldView vs BreezoMeter
- Climate FieldView vs IQAir
- Climate FieldView vs MarineTraffic
- Climate FieldView vs ChartCo
- Climate FieldView vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Climate FieldView vs Sea Machines
- Climate FieldView vs Veson Nautical
- Climate FieldView vs Wartsila Voyage
- Climate FieldView vs Windward
- Climate FieldView vs Dataloy
- Climate FieldView vs DNV Maritime
- Climate FieldView vs exactEarth
- Climate FieldView vs FourKites
- Climate FieldView vs Freightos
- Climate FieldView vs Kpler
- Climate FieldView vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- Climate FieldView vs NAPA
- Climate FieldView vs Nautilus Labs
- Climate FieldView vs Navis N4
- Climate FieldView vs NAVTOR
- INTTRA vs AccuWeather
- INTTRA vs MyRadar
- INTTRA vs The Weather Channel
- INTTRA vs WeatherBug
- INTTRA vs RadarScope
- INTTRA vs Apple Weather (Dark Sky)
- INTTRA vs Baron Weather
- INTTRA vs Carrot Weather
- INTTRA vs DTN Weather
- INTTRA vs Foreca
- INTTRA vs MeteoGroup
- INTTRA vs OpenWeatherMap
- INTTRA vs Aeris Weather
- INTTRA vs Airveda
- INTTRA vs Ambient Weather Network
- INTTRA vs Awair
- INTTRA vs BreezoMeter
- INTTRA vs IQAir
- INTTRA vs MarineTraffic
- INTTRA vs ChartCo
- INTTRA vs Kongsberg Maritime
- INTTRA vs Sea Machines
- INTTRA vs Veson Nautical
- INTTRA vs Wartsila Voyage
- INTTRA vs Windward
- INTTRA vs Dataloy
- INTTRA vs DNV Maritime
- INTTRA vs exactEarth
- INTTRA vs FourKites
- INTTRA vs Freightos
- INTTRA vs Kpler
- INTTRA vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- INTTRA vs NAPA
- INTTRA vs Nautilus Labs
- INTTRA vs Navis N4
- INTTRA vs NAVTOR
