Healthcare & Medical · head to head
Cerner vs tab32
C
Cerner
Healthcare & Medical
Health information technology solutions for healthcare organizations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cerner pricing is not publicly available; custom quotes required from sales; tab32 the $125 a month Alpine start up rate applies to year one only and rises to $225 a month from year two
- They diverge on capability: Cerner covers Electronic Health Records, tab32 covers AI-powered insights.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cerner and tab32 actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cerner
- Electronic Health Records
- Revenue Cycle
- Population Health
- Patient Engagement
- HL7
- FHIR
- Lab Systems
- HIPAA
Only in tab32
- AI-powered insights
- Cloud-based platform
- Patient scheduling
- Clinical charting
- Revenue cycle management
- Patient engagement
- Business analytics
- Imaging integration
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cerner
- Hospital and acute care EHR for chart review and clinical documentationnot tab32
- Mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devicesnot tab32
tab32
- Cloud dental practice management and imaging for small practicesnot Cerner
- Insurance claim submission, attachments and eligibility verificationnot Cerner
- Multi location reporting and analytics for dental groups and DSOsnot Cerner
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cerner
- Pricing is not publicly available; custom quotes required from sales
tab32
- The $125 a month Alpine start up rate applies to year one only and rises to $225 a month from year two
- The entry tier covers up to 3 providers and the established tier up to 5, so larger practices move up
- Claims and eligibility work are billed per transaction: $0.20 per claim, $0.50 per attachment and $1.25 per eligibility check
- Patient engagement features such as texting, reminders and online booking are paid add ons
- Summit, the tier for groups and DSOs, is custom priced with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Cerner
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Cerner review.
tab32
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- Cloud-based platform
- Patient scheduling
- Clinical charting
- Professional$449/month
- Everything in Starter
- Advanced AI analytics
- Patient engagement tools
- EnterpriseFree
- Everything in Professional
- Multi-location management
- Custom integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Cerner if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want revenue cycle.
Choose tab32 if
- You need ai-powered insights.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want cloud-based platform.
Questions people ask
- Is Cerner or tab32 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cerner starts at On request and tab32 at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cerner or tab32?
- Cerner starts at On request and tab32 at $299/month.
- Does Cerner or tab32 run on more platforms?
- Cerner runs on Web, iOS, Android. tab32 runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is Cerner best used for?
- Cerner is most often used for hospital and acute care ehr for chart review and clinical documentation, mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devices. Of those, hospital and acute care ehr for chart review and clinical documentation and mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devices are not what tab32 is typically brought in for.
- What can Cerner do that tab32 cannot?
- Cerner covers Electronic Health Records, Revenue Cycle, Population Health, Patient Engagement. tab32 covers AI-powered insights, Cloud-based platform, Patient scheduling, Clinical charting. Both handle Cloud deployment, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cerner vs Epic Systems
- Cerner vs Amwell
- Cerner vs Athenahealth
- Cerner vs BetterHelp
- Cerner vs Doctor on Demand
- Cerner vs Doxy.me
- Cerner vs DrChrono
- Cerner vs WebPT
- Cerner vs Allscripts
- Cerner vs Calm
- Cerner vs Dentrix
- Cerner vs Epic MyChart
- Cerner vs Headspace
- Cerner vs Jane App
- Cerner vs Kareo
- Cerner vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Cerner vs SimplePractice
- Cerner vs Teladoc Health
- Cerner vs CareStack
- Cerner vs Curve Dental
- Cerner vs Dentally
- Cerner vs Eaglesoft
- Cerner vs Dental Intelligence
- Cerner vs DentalIntel
- Cerner vs Dentimax
- Cerner vs Henry Schein One
- Cerner vs 3Shape TRIOS
- Cerner vs Apteryx
- Cerner vs DentalXChange
- Cerner vs Denticon
- Cerner vs DEXIS Imaging Suite
- Cerner vs Dolphin Imaging & Management
- Cerner vs Dovetail Dental
- Cerner vs DSO Analytics Hub
- Cerner vs iDentalSoft
- Cerner vs Kleer
- tab32 vs Epic Systems
- tab32 vs Amwell
- tab32 vs Athenahealth
- tab32 vs BetterHelp
- tab32 vs Doctor on Demand
- tab32 vs Doxy.me
- tab32 vs DrChrono
- tab32 vs WebPT
- tab32 vs Allscripts
- tab32 vs Calm
- tab32 vs Dentrix
- tab32 vs Epic MyChart
- tab32 vs Headspace
- tab32 vs Jane App
- tab32 vs Kareo
- tab32 vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- tab32 vs SimplePractice
- tab32 vs Teladoc Health
- tab32 vs CareStack
- tab32 vs Curve Dental
- tab32 vs Dentally
- tab32 vs Eaglesoft
- tab32 vs Dental Intelligence
- tab32 vs DentalIntel
- tab32 vs Dentimax
- tab32 vs Henry Schein One
- tab32 vs 3Shape TRIOS
- tab32 vs Apteryx
- tab32 vs DentalXChange
- tab32 vs Denticon
- tab32 vs DEXIS Imaging Suite
- tab32 vs Dolphin Imaging & Management
- tab32 vs Dovetail Dental
- tab32 vs DSO Analytics Hub
- tab32 vs iDentalSoft
- tab32 vs Kleer

