Software · head to head
Paragon vs Tines
The short version
- Only Tines has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Paragon no price is published for either plan, and both require a quote; Tines no-code, UI-driven approach is restrictive for complex logic and version control integration with SDLC
- They diverge on capability: Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Tines covers Story builder.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Paragon and Tines actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Paragon
- Embedded workflows
- Native integrations
- Workflow builder
- Error handling
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- Webhooks
- 500+ apps
Only in Tines
- Story builder
- Drag-and-drop workflows
- Event triggers
- Incident response automation
- Threat intelligence
- Case management
- Alert triage
- Jira
Both cover
- Slack
- GDPR
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Paragon
- Embedding third party integrations into a SaaS productnot Tines
- Managing customer facing connectors without building each onenot Tines
Tines
- Workflow Automationnot Paragon
- Data Integrationnot Paragon
- Process Automationnot Paragon
- App Integrationnot Paragon
- API Connectivitynot Paragon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Paragon
- No price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- Cost scales with the number of customer tenants using the integrations, so the bill follows an end customer count rather than the vendor's own usage
- SAML SSO, self hosting, dynamic field mapping and SLAs are all Enterprise only
Tines
- No-code, UI-driven approach is restrictive for complex logic and version control integration with SDLC
- No native log intelligence layer to validate data completeness
- Limited scope to security workloads, cannot handle general business automation
- Governance features lag behind EU AI Act compliance requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Paragon
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- 50 integrations
- Basic support
- Growth$999/month
- 200 integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$5000/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Dedicated support
Tines
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Tines review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Paragon if
- You need embedded workflows.
- You work on Web, Embedded.
- You also want native integrations.
Choose Tines if
- You need story builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want drag-and-drop workflows.
Questions people ask
- Is Paragon or Tines better?
- Neither clearly leads. Paragon starts at $299/month and Tines at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Paragon or Tines?
- Tines has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $299/month for Paragon and Free for Tines.
- Does Paragon or Tines run on more platforms?
- Paragon runs on Web, Embedded. Tines runs on Web.
- Can I use Tines for free?
- Yes. Tines has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paragon starts at $299/month.
- What is Paragon best used for?
- Paragon is most often used for embedding third party integrations into a saas product, managing customer facing connectors without building each one. Of those, embedding third party integrations into a saas product and managing customer facing connectors without building each one are not what Tines is typically brought in for.
- What can Paragon do that Tines cannot?
- Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Native integrations, Workflow builder, Error handling. Tines covers Story builder, Drag-and-drop workflows, Event triggers, Incident response automation. Both handle Slack, GDPR, Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Tines: What are Tines' pricing tiers?
Tines offers a free Community Edition for evaluation, Starter Edition at $500/month with annual billing, and Business/Enterprise tiers starting around $50,000/year for small security teams and scaling to $200,000+ for large SOCs.
SourceTines: What is the Community Edition limited to?
As of July 2026, the free Community Edition is scoped to 1 builder and 3 flows as an evaluation tool to test Tines' capabilities.
SourceTines: Is Tines limited to security automation?
Yes, Tines is purpose-built for security automation. Teams needing non-security automation on the same orchestration layer would need to evaluate alternatives.
SourceTines: Does Tines have native log intelligence capabilities?
No, Tines lacks a native log intelligence layer, meaning it cannot determine whether the data feeding your detection tools is complete. Teams must build automation against whatever alerts their existing infrastructure provides.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Paragon vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Paragon vs n8n
- Paragon vs Zapier
- Paragon vs MuleSoft
- Paragon vs Parabola
- Paragon vs Zapier Plus
- Paragon vs Jitterbit
- Paragon vs mParticle
- Paragon vs RudderStack
- Paragon vs Workato
- Paragon vs Airbyte
- Paragon vs Automate.io
- Paragon vs Boomi
- Paragon vs Browser Use
- Paragon vs Browserbase
- Paragon vs Celigo
- Paragon vs Census
- Paragon vs CrewAI
- Tines vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Tines vs n8n
- Tines vs Zapier
- Tines vs MuleSoft
- Tines vs Parabola
- Tines vs Zapier Plus
- Tines vs Jitterbit
- Tines vs mParticle
- Tines vs RudderStack
- Tines vs Workato
- Tines vs Airbyte
- Tines vs Automate.io
- Tines vs Boomi
- Tines vs Browser Use
- Tines vs Browserbase
- Tines vs Celigo
- Tines vs Census
- Tines vs CrewAI


