Softwr

Calendar & Time Management · head to head

Assistant.to vs Avaza

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Calendar & Time Management

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Avaza logo

Avaza

Consulting

Projects, timesheets, invoices done right

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Avaza free plan caps at 1 user with timesheet access, 5 active projects and 5 invoices/bills per month

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Avaza actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and Avaza differ
AttributeAssistant.toAvaza
PlatformsChrome-extensionWeb
CategoryCalendar & Time ManagementConsulting
Founded2014Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in Avaza

Nothing recorded that Assistant.to does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot Avaza
  • Appointment bookingnot Avaza
  • Time trackingnot Avaza
  • Resource managementnot Avaza
  • Team coordinationnot Avaza

Avaza

No use cases recorded yet. See the Avaza review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
  • Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in

Avaza

  • Free plan caps at 1 user with timesheet access, 5 active projects and 5 invoices/bills per month
  • Extra users cost $7/month each for admin or scheduling roles and $2/month for chat-only access

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

Avaza

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Avaza review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.
Assistant.to review

Choose Avaza if

  • You want to start without paying.
Avaza review

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or Avaza better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Avaza at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Avaza?
Assistant.to starts at Free and Avaza at Free.
Does Assistant.to or Avaza run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Avaza runs on Web.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Avaza is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that Avaza cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Assistant.to

More on Avaza

Keep looking

Other head to heads