Software · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs Heroku

Amazon Aurora
Software
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Amazon Aurora has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, Heroku covers Git-based deployment.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and Heroku actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7/month |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Web, Api, Workers |
| Founded | 2006 | 2007 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot Heroku
- Data storagenot Heroku
- Application backendnot Heroku
- Reportingnot Heroku
- Data analyticsnot Heroku
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Amazon Aurora
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Amazon Aurora
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or Heroku better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and Heroku at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or Heroku?
- Amazon Aurora has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Amazon Aurora and $7/month for Heroku.
- Does Amazon Aurora or Heroku run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Yes. Amazon Aurora has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Heroku is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that Heroku cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Aurora vs Airtable
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs DuckDB
- Amazon Aurora vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon Redshift
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Cassandra
- Amazon Aurora vs CouchDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs Grafana Cloud
- Amazon Aurora vs Neon
- Amazon Aurora vs DigitalOcean
- Amazon Aurora vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Amazon Aurora vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Amazon Aurora vs Deno Deploy
- Amazon Aurora vs Hetzner Cloud
- Amazon Aurora vs Linode
- Amazon Aurora vs Packer
- Amazon Aurora vs Pulumi
- Amazon Aurora vs Render
- Amazon Aurora vs Upstash
- Amazon Aurora vs Vagrant
- Amazon Aurora vs Vultr
- Amazon Aurora vs Akamai
- Amazon Aurora vs Alibaba Cloud
- Amazon Aurora vs Chef
- Amazon Aurora vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Cockroach Labs
- Heroku vs PostgreSQL
- Heroku vs Airtable
- Heroku vs Elasticsearch
- Heroku vs PlanetScale
- Heroku vs Azure SQL
- Heroku vs ClickHouse
- Heroku vs Couchbase
- Heroku vs DuckDB
- Heroku vs DynamoDB
- Heroku vs MariaDB
- Heroku vs Oracle Database
- Heroku vs Amazon RDS
- Heroku vs Amazon Redshift
- Heroku vs Apache Druid
- Heroku vs Cassandra
- Heroku vs CouchDB
- Heroku vs Firebolt
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo

