Software · head to head
Airbrake vs Consul
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Airbrake data retention is 30 days on every plan, including the $799 a month Business tier; Consul namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only
- They diverge on capability: Airbrake covers Error tracking, Consul covers Service discovery.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Airbrake and Consul actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Airbrake
- Error tracking
- Performance monitoring
- Deploy tracking
- Custom notifications
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Consul
- Service discovery
- Health checking
- Key/value store
- Multi-datacenter
- DNS interface
- Service mesh
- Load balancing
- Configuration management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Airbrake
- Error and exception monitoring for web applicationsnot Consul
- Performance monitoring alongside error trackingnot Consul
- Alerting a team when a deploy introduces a spike in errorsnot Consul
- Tracking errors across multiple projects in one accountnot Consul
Consul
- Service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructurenot Airbrake
- Running a service mesh with mutual TLS between servicesnot Airbrake
- Distributed key value configuration storage for applicationsnot Airbrake
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Airbrake
- Data retention is 30 days on every plan, including the $799 a month Business tier
- The entry plan at $19 a month covers 25,000 errors and 7,500 events
- Errors beyond the plan quota are billed on demand
- Audit logs and spike forgiveness require the Pro tier
- The lowest tier is limited to 1 user and 1 team
Consul
- Namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only
- Audit logging, OIDC authentication and FIPS 140-2 builds require Consul Enterprise, so compliance driven deployments cannot use the free edition
- Automated backups, redundancy zones, read replicas and automated server upgrades are Enterprise only
- Long Term Support releases are Enterprise only, so community users must upgrade to stay supported
- Service mesh and advanced traffic management sit in the Premium Enterprise tier above Standard Enterprise
- HashiCorp does not publish a Consul rate on its pricing page, which lists per resource prices for Terraform instead
Pricing, plan by plan
Airbrake
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Performance monitoring
- Deploy tracking
Consul
Free- Open SourceFree
- Service discovery
- Health checking
- KV store
Which should you pick?
Choose Airbrake if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want performance monitoring.
Choose Consul if
- You need service discovery.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want health checking.
Questions people ask
- Is Airbrake or Consul better?
- Neither clearly leads. Airbrake starts at Free and Consul at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Airbrake or Consul?
- Airbrake starts at Free and Consul at Free.
- Does Airbrake or Consul run on more platforms?
- Airbrake runs on Web, Api. Consul runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- Can I use Airbrake for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Airbrake best used for?
- Airbrake is most often used for error and exception monitoring for web applications, performance monitoring alongside error tracking, alerting a team when a deploy introduces a spike in errors, tracking errors across multiple projects in one account. Of those, error and exception monitoring for web applications and performance monitoring alongside error tracking are not what Consul is typically brought in for.
- What can Airbrake do that Consul cannot?
- Airbrake covers Error tracking, Performance monitoring, Deploy tracking, Custom notifications. Consul covers Service discovery, Health checking, Key/value store, Multi-datacenter.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Airbrake vs Elastic Stack
- Airbrake vs New Relic
- Airbrake vs Datadog Logs
- Airbrake vs Coralogix
- Airbrake vs Grafana Loki
- Airbrake vs CloudWatch
- Airbrake vs Dynatrace
- Airbrake vs InfluxDB
- Airbrake vs AppDynamics
- Airbrake vs Axiom
- Airbrake vs Azure Monitor
- Airbrake vs Better Stack
- Airbrake vs Bugsnag
- Airbrake vs Dynatrace Logs
- Airbrake vs Elastic
- Airbrake vs Elastic APM
- Airbrake vs Elasticsearch Service
- Airbrake vs ELK Stack
- Airbrake vs Prometheus
- Airbrake vs Cloudflare
- Airbrake vs Grafana
- Airbrake vs Ivanti
- Airbrake vs Palo Alto Networks
- Airbrake vs Splunk
- Airbrake vs Tailscale
- Airbrake vs Traefik
- Airbrake vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Consul vs Elastic Stack
- Consul vs New Relic
- Consul vs Datadog Logs
- Consul vs Coralogix
- Consul vs Grafana Loki
- Consul vs CloudWatch
- Consul vs Dynatrace
- Consul vs InfluxDB
- Consul vs AppDynamics
- Consul vs Axiom
- Consul vs Azure Monitor
- Consul vs Better Stack
- Consul vs Bugsnag
- Consul vs Dynatrace Logs
- Consul vs Elastic
- Consul vs Elastic APM
- Consul vs Elasticsearch Service
- Consul vs ELK Stack
- Consul vs Prometheus
- Consul vs Cloudflare
- Consul vs Grafana
- Consul vs Ivanti
- Consul vs Palo Alto Networks
- Consul vs Splunk
- Consul vs Tailscale
- Consul vs Traefik
- Consul vs Ubiquiti UniFi


