Software · head to head
Airbrake vs Palo Alto Networks
The short version
- Only Airbrake has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Airbrake data retention is 30 days on every plan, including the $799 a month Business tier; Palo Alto Networks enterprise-focused pricing model
- They diverge on capability: Airbrake covers Error tracking, Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Airbrake and Palo Alto Networks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Airbrake | Palo Alto Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid |
| Founded | 2008 | 2005 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Airbrake
- Error tracking
- Performance monitoring
- Deploy tracking
- Custom notifications
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Api support
Only in Palo Alto Networks
- Advanced threat prevention
- Threat detection and response
- Cloud security
- Endpoint protection
- Network security
- API protection
- Incident response
- Threat intelligence
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Airbrake
- Error and exception monitoring for web applicationsnot Palo Alto Networks
- Performance monitoring alongside error trackingnot Palo Alto Networks
- Alerting a team when a deploy introduces a spike in errorsnot Palo Alto Networks
- Tracking errors across multiple projects in one accountnot Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto Networks
- Enterprise network security and threat protectionnot Airbrake
- Cloud-native application protectionnot Airbrake
- Identity and access securitynot Airbrake
- Security operations and incident responsenot Airbrake
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Airbrake
- Data retention is 30 days on every plan, including the $799 a month Business tier
- The entry plan at $19 a month covers 25,000 errors and 7,500 events
- Errors beyond the plan quota are billed on demand
- Audit logs and spike forgiveness require the Pro tier
- The lowest tier is limited to 1 user and 1 team
Palo Alto Networks
- Enterprise-focused pricing model
- Complex implementation required
Pricing, plan by plan
Airbrake
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Performance monitoring
- Deploy tracking
Palo Alto Networks
On request- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Threat prevention
- Detection and response
- Cloud security
Which should you pick?
Choose Airbrake if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want performance monitoring.
Choose Palo Alto Networks if
- You need advanced threat prevention.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- You also want threat detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Airbrake or Palo Alto Networks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Airbrake starts at Free and Palo Alto Networks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Airbrake or Palo Alto Networks?
- Airbrake has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Airbrake and On request for Palo Alto Networks.
- Does Airbrake or Palo Alto Networks run on more platforms?
- Airbrake runs on Web, Api. Palo Alto Networks runs on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- Can I use Airbrake for free?
- Yes. Airbrake has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Palo Alto Networks starts at On request.
- What is Airbrake best used for?
- Airbrake is most often used for error and exception monitoring for web applications, performance monitoring alongside error tracking, alerting a team when a deploy introduces a spike in errors, tracking errors across multiple projects in one account. Of those, error and exception monitoring for web applications and performance monitoring alongside error tracking are not what Palo Alto Networks is typically brought in for.
- What can Airbrake do that Palo Alto Networks cannot?
- Airbrake covers Error tracking, Performance monitoring, Deploy tracking, Custom notifications. Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention, Threat detection and response, Cloud security, Endpoint protection. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
More on Palo Alto Networks
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Airbrake vs Elastic Stack
- Airbrake vs New Relic
- Airbrake vs Datadog Logs
- Airbrake vs Coralogix
- Airbrake vs Grafana Loki
- Airbrake vs CloudWatch
- Airbrake vs Dynatrace
- Airbrake vs InfluxDB
- Airbrake vs AppDynamics
- Airbrake vs Axiom
- Airbrake vs Azure Monitor
- Airbrake vs Better Stack
- Airbrake vs Bugsnag
- Airbrake vs Dynatrace Logs
- Airbrake vs Elastic
- Airbrake vs Elastic APM
- Airbrake vs Elasticsearch Service
- Airbrake vs ELK Stack
- Airbrake vs Prometheus
- Airbrake vs Cloudflare
- Airbrake vs Consul
- Airbrake vs Grafana
- Airbrake vs Ivanti
- Airbrake vs Splunk
- Airbrake vs Tailscale
- Airbrake vs Traefik
- Airbrake vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Palo Alto Networks vs Elastic Stack
- Palo Alto Networks vs New Relic
- Palo Alto Networks vs Datadog Logs
- Palo Alto Networks vs Coralogix
- Palo Alto Networks vs Grafana Loki
- Palo Alto Networks vs CloudWatch
- Palo Alto Networks vs Dynatrace
- Palo Alto Networks vs InfluxDB
- Palo Alto Networks vs AppDynamics
- Palo Alto Networks vs Axiom
- Palo Alto Networks vs Azure Monitor
- Palo Alto Networks vs Better Stack
- Palo Alto Networks vs Bugsnag
- Palo Alto Networks vs Dynatrace Logs
- Palo Alto Networks vs Elastic
- Palo Alto Networks vs Elastic APM
- Palo Alto Networks vs Elasticsearch Service
- Palo Alto Networks vs ELK Stack
- Palo Alto Networks vs Prometheus
- Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare
- Palo Alto Networks vs Consul
- Palo Alto Networks vs Grafana
- Palo Alto Networks vs Ivanti
- Palo Alto Networks vs Splunk
- Palo Alto Networks vs Tailscale
- Palo Alto Networks vs Traefik
- Palo Alto Networks vs Ubiquiti UniFi


