Softwr

Software · head to head

Consul vs Elastic APM

Consul logo

Consul

Software

Service discovery, networking, and security

From
Free
Rated
-
Elastic APM logo

Elastic APM

Software

Application Performance Monitoring from Elastic

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Consul namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only; Elastic APM pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service
  • They diverge on capability: Consul covers Service discovery, Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Consul and Elastic APM actually diverge.

Attributes where Consul and Elastic APM differ
AttributeConsulElastic APM
PlatformsLinux, Windows, Mac, CloudWeb, Api
Founded20142011

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Consul

  • Service discovery
  • Health checking
  • Key/value store
  • Multi-datacenter
  • DNS interface
  • Service mesh
  • Load balancing
  • Configuration management

Only in Elastic APM

  • Performance monitoring
  • Error tracking
  • Transaction tracing
  • Custom metrics
  • API
  • Webhooks
  • REST
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Consul

  • Service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructurenot Elastic APM
  • Running a service mesh with mutual TLS between servicesnot Elastic APM
  • Distributed key value configuration storage for applicationsnot Elastic APM

Elastic APM

  • Distributed tracing across microservicesnot Consul
  • Auto-instrumenting Java, .NET, Python, Go, Node.js, Ruby, PHP and C++ servicesnot Consul
  • OpenTelemetry-native collection through the Elastic distributionsnot Consul
  • Correlating latency and errors with machine learningnot Consul
  • Monitoring LLM calls alongside application tracesnot Consul

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Consul

  • Namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only
  • Audit logging, OIDC authentication and FIPS 140-2 builds require Consul Enterprise, so compliance driven deployments cannot use the free edition
  • Automated backups, redundancy zones, read replicas and automated server upgrades are Enterprise only
  • Long Term Support releases are Enterprise only, so community users must upgrade to stay supported
  • Service mesh and advanced traffic management sit in the Premium Enterprise tier above Standard Enterprise
  • HashiCorp does not publish a Consul rate on its pricing page, which lists per resource prices for Terraform instead

Elastic APM

  • Pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service
  • Self-managed deployment means running and scaling Elasticsearch yourself
  • Serverless does not carry every capability the hosted option does

Pricing, plan by plan

Consul

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Service discovery
    • Health checking
    • KV store

Elastic APM

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Performance monitoring
    • Error tracking
    • Transaction tracing

Which should you pick?

Choose Consul if

  • You need service discovery.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
  • You also want health checking.

Choose Elastic APM if

  • You need performance monitoring.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want error tracking.

Questions people ask

Is Consul or Elastic APM better?
Neither clearly leads. Consul starts at Free and Elastic APM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Consul or Elastic APM?
Consul starts at Free and Elastic APM at Free.
Does Consul or Elastic APM run on more platforms?
Consul runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud. Elastic APM runs on Web, Api.
Can I use Consul for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Consul best used for?
Consul is most often used for service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructure, running a service mesh with mutual tls between services, distributed key value configuration storage for applications. Of those, service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructure and running a service mesh with mutual tls between services are not what Elastic APM is typically brought in for.
What can Consul do that Elastic APM cannot?
Consul covers Service discovery, Health checking, Key/value store, Multi-datacenter. Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Error tracking, Transaction tracing, Custom metrics.

Related pages

Other head to heads