Software · head to head
Airbrake vs Traefik
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Airbrake data retention is 30 days on every plan, including the $799 a month Business tier; Traefik requires Kubernetes or container knowledge
- They diverge on capability: Airbrake covers Error tracking, Traefik covers API Gateway.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Airbrake and Traefik actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Airbrake
- Error tracking
- Performance monitoring
- Deploy tracking
- Custom notifications
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Traefik
- API Gateway
- Load Balancing
- SSL/TLS Termination
- Kubernetes
- Docker
- Consul
- etcd
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Airbrake
- Error and exception monitoring for web applicationsnot Traefik
- Performance monitoring alongside error trackingnot Traefik
- Alerting a team when a deploy introduces a spike in errorsnot Traefik
- Tracking errors across multiple projects in one accountnot Traefik
Traefik
- API gateway for microservices architecturenot Airbrake
- Kubernetes ingress controllernot Airbrake
- Container and VM traffic routingnot Airbrake
- Cloud-native application managementnot Airbrake
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Airbrake
- Data retention is 30 days on every plan, including the $799 a month Business tier
- The entry plan at $19 a month covers 25,000 errors and 7,500 events
- Errors beyond the plan quota are billed on demand
- Audit logs and spike forgiveness require the Pro tier
- The lowest tier is limited to 1 user and 1 team
Traefik
- Requires Kubernetes or container knowledge
- Complex configuration for advanced features
Pricing, plan by plan
Airbrake
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Performance monitoring
- Deploy tracking
Traefik
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Traefik review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Airbrake if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want performance monitoring.
Choose Traefik if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud.
- You also want load balancing.
Questions people ask
- Is Airbrake or Traefik better?
- Neither clearly leads. Airbrake starts at Free and Traefik at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Airbrake or Traefik?
- Airbrake starts at Free and Traefik at Free.
- Does Airbrake or Traefik run on more platforms?
- Airbrake runs on Web, Api. Traefik runs on Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud.
- Can I use Airbrake for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Airbrake best used for?
- Airbrake is most often used for error and exception monitoring for web applications, performance monitoring alongside error tracking, alerting a team when a deploy introduces a spike in errors, tracking errors across multiple projects in one account. Of those, error and exception monitoring for web applications and performance monitoring alongside error tracking are not what Traefik is typically brought in for.
- What can Airbrake do that Traefik cannot?
- Airbrake covers Error tracking, Performance monitoring, Deploy tracking, Custom notifications. Traefik covers API Gateway, Load Balancing, SSL/TLS Termination, Kubernetes.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Airbrake vs Elastic Stack
- Airbrake vs New Relic
- Airbrake vs Datadog Logs
- Airbrake vs Coralogix
- Airbrake vs Grafana Loki
- Airbrake vs CloudWatch
- Airbrake vs Dynatrace
- Airbrake vs InfluxDB
- Airbrake vs AppDynamics
- Airbrake vs Axiom
- Airbrake vs Azure Monitor
- Airbrake vs Better Stack
- Airbrake vs Bugsnag
- Airbrake vs Dynatrace Logs
- Airbrake vs Elastic
- Airbrake vs Elastic APM
- Airbrake vs Elasticsearch Service
- Airbrake vs ELK Stack
- Airbrake vs Prometheus
- Airbrake vs Cloudflare
- Airbrake vs Consul
- Airbrake vs Grafana
- Airbrake vs Ivanti
- Airbrake vs Palo Alto Networks
- Airbrake vs Splunk
- Airbrake vs Tailscale
- Airbrake vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Traefik vs Elastic Stack
- Traefik vs New Relic
- Traefik vs Datadog Logs
- Traefik vs Coralogix
- Traefik vs Grafana Loki
- Traefik vs CloudWatch
- Traefik vs Dynatrace
- Traefik vs InfluxDB
- Traefik vs AppDynamics
- Traefik vs Axiom
- Traefik vs Azure Monitor
- Traefik vs Better Stack
- Traefik vs Bugsnag
- Traefik vs Dynatrace Logs
- Traefik vs Elastic
- Traefik vs Elastic APM
- Traefik vs Elasticsearch Service
- Traefik vs ELK Stack
- Traefik vs Prometheus
- Traefik vs Cloudflare
- Traefik vs Consul
- Traefik vs Grafana
- Traefik vs Ivanti
- Traefik vs Palo Alto Networks
- Traefik vs Splunk
- Traefik vs Tailscale
- Traefik vs Ubiquiti UniFi


