Cloud · head to head
AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Wasabi
The short version
- Only AWS (Amazon Web Services) has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: AWS (Amazon Web Services) data transfer in is free and data transfer out is charged, which is the standard source of unexpected bills; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: AWS (Amazon Web Services) covers EC2 - Virtual Servers, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AWS (Amazon Web Services) and Wasabi actually diverge.
| Attribute | AWS (Amazon Web Services) | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7.99/month |
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cli, Mobile | Web, API |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- EC2 - Virtual Servers
- S3 - Object Storage
- RDS - Managed Database
- Lambda - Serverless Computing
- CloudFront - CDN
- VPC - Virtual Network
- IAM - Access Management
- CloudWatch - Monitoring
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- SOC2
- HIPAA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Web hostingnot Wasabi
- Data storagenot Wasabi
- Machine learningnot Wasabi
- Big data analyticsnot Wasabi
- Application developmentnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Media storagenot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Archive replacementnot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Ransomware protectionnot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Data transfer in is free and data transfer out is charged, which is the standard source of unexpected bills
- Discounts require one or three year Savings Plan commitments rather than being automatic
- Every service is priced separately, so a working architecture has no single published cost
- The free tier is a promotional allowance rather than an ongoing free plan
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Free- AWS Free TierFree
- EC2 750 hours/month
- 5GB S3 storage
- 20GB data transfer
- Pay-As-You-GoFree
- No upfront payment
- No long-term commitments
- Pay only for what you use
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose AWS (Amazon Web Services) if
- You need ec2 - virtual servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli, Mobile.
- You also want s3 - object storage.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is AWS (Amazon Web Services) or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. AWS (Amazon Web Services) starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AWS (Amazon Web Services) or Wasabi?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for AWS (Amazon Web Services) and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does AWS (Amazon Web Services) or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) runs on Web, Api, Cli, Mobile. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use AWS (Amazon Web Services) for free?
- Yes. AWS (Amazon Web Services) has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is AWS (Amazon Web Services) best used for?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) is most often used for web hosting, data storage, machine learning, big data analytics. Of those, web hosting and data storage are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can AWS (Amazon Web Services) do that Wasabi cannot?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) covers EC2 - Virtual Servers, S3 - Object Storage, RDS - Managed Database, Lambda - Serverless Computing. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle SOC2, HIPAA.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AWS (Amazon Web Services): What are AWS's payment options and pricing models?
AWS offers four pricing approaches: pay-as-you-go (you pay only for what you use), flat-rate plans combining multiple services into one monthly price without overages, Savings Plans offering discounts on compute and machine learning with 1- or 3-year commitments, and volume-based tiered pricing where costs decrease as usage increases.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceAWS (Amazon Web Services): Are there contracts, termination fees, or commitments required for AWS?
No long-term contracts are required for AWS services. No termination fees apply once you stop using the service. Savings Plans provide optional 1- or 3-year commitments with discounted hourly rates, but you can revert to pay-as-you-go pricing anytime.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceAWS (Amazon Web Services): Does AWS offer a free tier?
AWS provides a free tier that offers hands-on experience with AWS products at no charge. The free tier allows new customers to try eligible services before committing to paid usage.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceAWS (Amazon Web Services): How do I estimate my AWS costs?
AWS provides the AWS Pricing Calculator and Cost Explorer tool to estimate costs for single or multiple services. AWS also offers cost optimization recommendations, performance reporting, and budget alerts to help track and control spending.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
More on AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Other head to heads
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Google Cloud Platform
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Microsoft Azure
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Oracle Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Vultr
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Linode
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Hetzner Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Neon
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Scaleway
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Akamai
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs OVHcloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs DigitalOcean
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Fireworks AI
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Heroku
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Vault
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Beam Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Caddy
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Cerebrium
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Zeabur
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Porter
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Contabo
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Encore
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs HAProxy
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs IBM Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs kind
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Koyeb
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Kustomize
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs Oracle Cloud
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Akamai
- Wasabi vs OVHcloud
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Fireworks AI
- Wasabi vs Heroku
- Wasabi vs Vault
- Wasabi vs Beam Cloud
- Wasabi vs Caddy
- Wasabi vs Cerebrium
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


