Software · head to head
PrusaSlicer vs Modo
The short version
- Only PrusaSlicer has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: PrusaSlicer limited to slicing workflow only; no interactive 3D design capabilities; Modo foundry announced on November 7, 2024 that it is winding down development of Modo after the Modo 17.1 release, with no further feature or maintenance releases anticipated
- They diverge on capability: PrusaSlicer covers Automatic supports, Modo covers Polygon modeling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PrusaSlicer and Modo actually diverge.
| Attribute | PrusaSlicer | Modo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $29/month |
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2012 | 1996 |
Identical on both: platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PrusaSlicer
- Automatic supports
- Multi-material
- Variable layer height
- Custom G-code
- Paint-on supports
- Ironing
- Prusa printers
- Most FDM printers
Only in Modo
- Polygon modeling
- Subdivision surfaces
- Sculpting
- UV tools
- Procedural modeling
- Rendering
- Animation
- MeshFusion
Both cover
- Windows support
- MacOS support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PrusaSlicer
- Preparation of STL models for 3D printingnot Modo
- Multi-material printing preparationnot Modo
- G-code generation and customisation via macrosnot Modo
Modo
- Polygon and subdivision surface modelling for media and entertainment assetsnot PrusaSlicer
- Look development and rendering of product and character modelsnot PrusaSlicer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PrusaSlicer
- Limited to slicing workflow only; no interactive 3D design capabilities
- Designed for RepRap-based printers; compatibility with other printer architectures varies
Modo
- Foundry announced on November 7, 2024 that it is winding down development of Modo after the Modo 17.1 release, with no further feature or maintenance releases anticipated
- Support continues only until each customer's current contract term expires
- Foundry does not guarantee that Modo will keep working on future operating system updates because no patches will be issued, and recommends customers migrate to alternative 3D workflows
- Perpetual licences keep working but receive no further updates, bug fixes or support
- The Modo forums closed in December 2024 and downloads, docs and the support knowledgebase were committed only until November 2025
Pricing, plan by plan
PrusaSlicer
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PrusaSlicer review.
Modo
$29/month- Indie$599/month
- Full Modo
- Revenue limit $100K
- Modo$1898/month
- Full commercial license
Which should you pick?
Choose PrusaSlicer if
- You need automatic supports.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want multi-material.
Choose Modo if
- You need polygon modeling.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want subdivision surfaces.
Questions people ask
- Is PrusaSlicer or Modo better?
- Neither clearly leads. PrusaSlicer starts at Free and Modo at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PrusaSlicer or Modo?
- PrusaSlicer has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for PrusaSlicer and $29/month for Modo.
- Does PrusaSlicer or Modo run on more platforms?
- PrusaSlicer runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Modo runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- Can I use PrusaSlicer for free?
- Yes. PrusaSlicer has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Modo starts at $29/month.
- What is PrusaSlicer best used for?
- PrusaSlicer is most often used for preparation of stl models for 3d printing, multi-material printing preparation, g-code generation and customisation via macros. Of those, preparation of stl models for 3d printing and multi-material printing preparation are not what Modo is typically brought in for.
- What can PrusaSlicer do that Modo cannot?
- PrusaSlicer covers Automatic supports, Multi-material, Variable layer height, Custom G-code. Modo covers Polygon modeling, Subdivision surfaces, Sculpting, UV tools. Both handle Windows support, MacOS support, Linux support.
Related pages
More on PrusaSlicer
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- PrusaSlicer vs Enscape
- PrusaSlicer vs V-Ray
- PrusaSlicer vs FreeCAD
- PrusaSlicer vs KeyShot
- PrusaSlicer vs Lumion
- PrusaSlicer vs Houdini
- PrusaSlicer vs Arnold
- PrusaSlicer vs Inventor
- PrusaSlicer vs Mudbox
- PrusaSlicer vs Corona Renderer
- PrusaSlicer vs D5 Render
- PrusaSlicer vs Twinmotion
- PrusaSlicer vs LightWave 3D
- PrusaSlicer vs OpenSCAD
- PrusaSlicer vs Siemens NX
- PrusaSlicer vs ZBrush
- PrusaSlicer vs 3D-Coat
- PrusaSlicer vs Alibre Design
- Modo vs Enscape
- Modo vs V-Ray
- Modo vs FreeCAD
- Modo vs KeyShot
- Modo vs Lumion
- Modo vs Houdini
- Modo vs Arnold
- Modo vs Inventor
- Modo vs Mudbox
- Modo vs Corona Renderer
- Modo vs D5 Render
- Modo vs Twinmotion
- Modo vs LightWave 3D
- Modo vs OpenSCAD
- Modo vs Siemens NX
- Modo vs ZBrush
- Modo vs 3D-Coat
- Modo vs Alibre Design


