Softwr

API Management · head to head

Akana vs Paw

Akana logo

Akana

API Management

Enterprise API lifecycle management platform

From
$2500/monthly
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Paw logo

Paw

API Management

Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing

From
$99/one-time
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Akana owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com; Paw now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client
  • They diverge on capability: Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, Paw covers REST Client.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Akana and Paw actually diverge.

Attributes where Akana and Paw differ
AttributeAkanaPaw
Starting price$2500/monthly$99/one-time
PlatformsCloud, On-premise, HybridMacOS
Founded20012013

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Akana

  • API Lifecycle Management
  • API Security
  • Governance Controls
  • OAuth
  • SAML
  • LDAP
  • Active Directory
  • Cloud support

Only in Paw

  • REST Client
  • Scripting
  • Dynamic Values
  • Slack
  • GitHub
  • Custom extensions
  • MacOS support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Akana

  • API lifecycle management across REST, SOAP and GraphQLnot Paw
  • Applying OAuth, JWT and SAML policies at the gatewaynot Paw
  • Running the same platform on-premises, in Kubernetes or across cloudsnot Paw
  • Developer portal and API monetisationnot Paw
  • Monitoring API traffic and enforcing quotasnot Paw

Paw

  • API Developmentnot Akana
  • API Gatewaynot Akana
  • API Testingnot Akana
  • API Documentationnot Akana
  • Microservicesnot Akana

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Akana

  • Owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
  • Pricing is not published; only a 30 day trial is offered

Paw

  • Now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client

Pricing, plan by plan

Akana

$2500/monthly
  • Professional$2500/monthly
    • API Gateway
    • Developer Portal
    • Basic analytics
  • Enterprise$5000/monthly
    • Advanced governance
    • Multi-cloud support
    • Premium support
  • Custom$undefined/monthly
    • Custom solutions
    • Dedicated support
    • SLA guarantee

Paw

$99/one-time
  • Standard$99/one-time
    • Full REST client
    • Advanced scripting
    • Extensions
  • Annual License$49/yearly
    • All features
    • Updates
    • Priority support

Which should you pick?

Choose Akana if

  • You need api lifecycle management.
  • You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
  • You also want api security.
Akana review

Choose Paw if

  • You need rest client.
  • You work on MacOS.
  • You also want scripting.
Paw review

Questions people ask

Is Akana or Paw better?
Neither clearly leads. Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Paw at $99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Akana or Paw?
Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Paw at $99/one-time.
Does Akana or Paw run on more platforms?
Akana runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid. Paw runs on MacOS.
What is Akana best used for?
Akana is most often used for api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql, applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway, running the same platform on-premises, in kubernetes or across clouds, developer portal and api monetisation. Of those, api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql and applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway are not what Paw is typically brought in for.
What can Akana do that Paw cannot?
Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, API Security, Governance Controls, OAuth. Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Akana

More on Paw

Keep looking

Other head to heads