Technology · head to head
Okta vs Thunder Client

Thunder Client
API Management
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Thunder Client covers REST Client.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Okta and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Okta | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, SaaS | VSCode extension, Web |
| Category | Technology | API Management |
| Founded | 2009 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Thunder Client
- Customer identitynot Thunder Client
- B2B integrationnot Thunder Client
- Zero Trust securitynot Thunder Client
- Compliancenot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Okta
- API Gatewaynot Okta
- API Testingnot Okta
- API Documentationnot Okta
- Microservicesnot Okta
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$null/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Okta or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Okta starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Okta or Thunder Client?
- Okta starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Okta or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Okta runs on Web, SaaS. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Okta for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Okta best used for?
- Okta is most often used for employee sso, customer identity, b2b integration, zero trust security. Of those, employee sso and customer identity are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Okta do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs PyCharm
- Okta vs Sketch
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Coda
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs GitHub
- Okta vs Appwrite
- Okta vs Hasura
- Okta vs PocketBase
- Okta vs Sanity
- Okta vs Apigee
- Okta vs Bruno
- Okta vs KeystoneJS
- Okta vs Parse Server
- Okta vs Stoplight
- Okta vs Strapi
- Okta vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Okta vs WSO2 API Manager
- Okta vs 3scale
- Okta vs Akana
- Okta vs Asyncapi
- Okta vs AWS API Gateway
- Okta vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Okta vs Backendless
- Thunder Client vs Asana
- Thunder Client vs ClickUp
- Thunder Client vs Figma
- Thunder Client vs Linear
- Thunder Client vs Monday.com
- Thunder Client vs Greenhouse
- Thunder Client vs Notion
- Thunder Client vs Amplitude
- Thunder Client vs Datadog
- Thunder Client vs PostHog
- Thunder Client vs PyCharm
- Thunder Client vs Sketch
- Thunder Client vs Docker
- Thunder Client vs Netlify
- Thunder Client vs Aha!
- Thunder Client vs Coda
- Thunder Client vs Dashlane
- Thunder Client vs GitHub
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Apigee
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs KeystoneJS
- Thunder Client vs Parse Server
- Thunder Client vs Stoplight
- Thunder Client vs Strapi
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs 3scale
- Thunder Client vs Akana
- Thunder Client vs Asyncapi
- Thunder Client vs AWS API Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Thunder Client vs Backendless

