Softwr

Technology · head to head

PostHog vs Thunder Client

PostHog logo

PostHog

Technology

The single platform to analyze, test, observe, and deploy new features

From
Free
Rated
-
Thunder Client logo

Thunder Client

API Management

Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: PostHog the free tier covers 1M events, 5K web session recordings and 2.5K mobile recordings per month before usage-based billing starts; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
  • They diverge on capability: PostHog covers Product analytics, Thunder Client covers REST Client.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which PostHog and Thunder Client actually diverge.

Attributes where PostHog and Thunder Client differ
AttributePostHogThunder Client
Pricing modelusage-basedfreemium
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiVSCode extension, Web
CategoryTechnologyAPI Management
Founded20202021

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in PostHog

  • Product analytics
  • Session recording
  • Feature flags
  • A/B testing
  • Heatmaps
  • SQL access
  • Data warehouse
  • Apps platform

Only in Thunder Client

  • REST Client
  • Environment variables
  • Response testing
  • VSCode
  • Webhook support
  • VSCode extension support
  • Web support

Both cover

  • GitHub

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

PostHog

  • Product analyticsnot Thunder Client
  • Feature experimentationnot Thunder Client
  • User behavior trackingnot Thunder Client
  • A/B testingnot Thunder Client
  • Debug production issuesnot Thunder Client

Thunder Client

  • API Developmentnot PostHog
  • API Gatewaynot PostHog
  • API Testingnot PostHog
  • API Documentationnot PostHog
  • Microservicesnot PostHog

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

PostHog

  • The free tier covers 1M events, 5K web session recordings and 2.5K mobile recordings per month before usage-based billing starts
  • Accounts without a card on file are limited to 1 project; adding one raises it to 6
  • Data retention is 1 year until a card is added, which extends it to 7 years
  • Support is community-only until the account is on a paid plan
  • Error tracking is capped at 100K exceptions and surveys at 1500 responses per month on the free tier

Thunder Client

  • Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs

Pricing, plan by plan

PostHog

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 1M events/month
    • 5K sessions/month
    • Unlimited users
  • Paid$undefined/month
    • $0.00031/event
    • $0.005/session
    • Advanced permissions
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • SAML SSO
    • Advanced security
    • Dedicated support

Thunder Client

Free
  • FreeFree
    • REST client
    • Collection management
    • Local testing
  • Pro$8/monthly
    • Cloud sync
    • Team collaboration
    • Advanced features

Which should you pick?

Choose PostHog if

  • You need product analytics.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want session recording.

Choose Thunder Client if

  • You need rest client.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on VSCode extension, Web.
  • You also want environment variables.

Questions people ask

Is PostHog or Thunder Client better?
Neither clearly leads. PostHog starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, PostHog or Thunder Client?
PostHog starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
Does PostHog or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
PostHog runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
Can I use PostHog for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is PostHog best used for?
PostHog is most often used for product analytics, feature experimentation, user behavior tracking, a/b testing. Of those, product analytics and feature experimentation are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
What can PostHog do that Thunder Client cannot?
PostHog covers Product analytics, Session recording, Feature flags, A/B testing. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode. Both handle GitHub.

Related pages

Other head to heads