Software · head to head
Linear vs Make
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Linear no task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues; Make free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month
- They diverge on capability: Linear covers Fast, real-time sync, Make covers Visual workflow builder.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Linear and Make actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Linear
- Fast, real-time sync
- Keyboard-first design
- Automatic issue tracking
- Cycles (sprints)
- Projects & milestones
- Custom workflows
- API & webhooks
- Built-in roadmaps
Only in Make
- Visual workflow builder
- Webhooks
- API connectors
- Conditional logic
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Linear
- Issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issuesnot Make
- Strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and PRDs from idea to launchnot Make
- Agent-assisted development, with agents drafting docs and submitting pull requestsnot Make
- Code review with structural diffs for human and agent outputnot Make
- Progress monitoring via dashboards tracking cycle times and project healthnot Make
Make
- Automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applicationsnot Linear
- Building AI agents and workflow automation without extensive codingnot Linear
- Enterprise automation with GDPR, SOC 2 Type II compliancenot Linear
- Rapid deployment of automations from concept to livenot Linear
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Linear
- No task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- No native time-tracking or hour-logging feature
- No native Linux desktop app; official FAQ states it 'may come in the future but it's not on the roadmap for now'
- Free tier capped at 250 issues and 2 teams
Make
- Free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month
- Free tier restricted to 2 active scenarios maximum
- Free tier enforces 15-minute minimum scheduling interval
- Credit-based model means costs scale with usage volume, not just features
Pricing, plan by plan
Linear
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited members
- 2 teams
- 250 issues
- Basic$10/month
- 5 teams
- Unlimited issues
- Unlimited file uploads
- Business$16/month
- Unlimited teams
- Private teams/guests
- Triage Intelligence
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML/SCIM
- Granular admin controls
- Invoice/PO billing
Make
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Make review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Linear if
- You need fast, real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want keyboard-first design.
Choose Make if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want webhooks.
Questions people ask
- Is Linear or Make better?
- Neither clearly leads. Linear starts at Free and Make at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Linear or Make?
- Linear starts at Free and Make at Free.
- Does Linear or Make run on more platforms?
- Linear runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows. Make runs on Web.
- Can I use Linear for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Linear best used for?
- Linear is most often used for issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issues, strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and prds from idea to launch, agent-assisted development, with agents drafting docs and submitting pull requests, code review with structural diffs for human and agent output. Of those, issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issues and strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and prds from idea to launch are not what Make is typically brought in for.
- What can Linear do that Make cannot?
- Linear covers Fast, real-time sync, Keyboard-first design, Automatic issue tracking, Cycles (sprints). Make covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, API connectors, Conditional logic.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Linear vs Asana
- Linear vs ClickUp
- Linear vs Figma
- Linear vs Monday.com
- Linear vs Greenhouse
- Linear vs Notion
- Linear vs Amplitude
- Linear vs Datadog
- Linear vs PostHog
- Linear vs PyCharm
- Linear vs Sketch
- Linear vs Docker
- Linear vs Netlify
- Linear vs Okta
- Linear vs Aha!
- Linear vs Coda
- Linear vs Dashlane
- Linear vs GitHub
- Linear vs HubSpot CRM
- Linear vs Fireflies.ai
- Linear vs Gather
- Linear vs IFTTT
- Linear vs Otter.ai
- Linear vs tl;dv
- Linear vs Vidyard
- Linear vs ConnectWise
- Linear vs Grain
- Linear vs Kaseya VSA
- Linear vs Krisp
- Linear vs Mmhmm
- Linear vs Monday Sales CRM
- Linear vs Mural
- Linear vs N-able N-central
- Linear vs Pop
- Linear vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Linear vs Splashtop
- Make vs Asana
- Make vs ClickUp
- Make vs Figma
- Make vs Monday.com
- Make vs Greenhouse
- Make vs Notion
- Make vs Amplitude
- Make vs Datadog
- Make vs PostHog
- Make vs PyCharm
- Make vs Sketch
- Make vs Docker
- Make vs Netlify
- Make vs Okta
- Make vs Aha!
- Make vs Coda
- Make vs Dashlane
- Make vs GitHub
- Make vs HubSpot CRM
- Make vs Fireflies.ai
- Make vs Gather
- Make vs IFTTT
- Make vs Otter.ai
- Make vs tl;dv
- Make vs Vidyard
- Make vs ConnectWise
- Make vs Grain
- Make vs Kaseya VSA
- Make vs Krisp
- Make vs Mmhmm
- Make vs Monday Sales CRM
- Make vs Mural
- Make vs N-able N-central
- Make vs Pop
- Make vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Make vs Splashtop


