Software · head to head
Hasura vs Paragon

Hasura
Software
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Hasura has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Hasura database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only; Paragon no price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- They diverge on capability: Hasura covers GraphQL API, Paragon covers Embedded workflows.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hasura and Paragon actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
Only in Paragon
- Embedded workflows
- Native integrations
- Workflow builder
- Error handling
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- 500+ apps
- Custom integrations
Both cover
- Webhooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot Paragon
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot Paragon
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot Paragon
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot Paragon
Paragon
- Embedding third party integrations into a SaaS productnot Hasura
- Managing customer facing connectors without building each onenot Hasura
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hasura
- Database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
Paragon
- No price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- Cost scales with the number of customer tenants using the integrations, so the bill follows an end customer count rather than the vendor's own usage
- SAML SSO, self hosting, dynamic field mapping and SLAs are all Enterprise only
Pricing, plan by plan
Hasura
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Hasura review.
Paragon
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- 50 integrations
- Basic support
- Growth$999/month
- 200 integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$5000/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Choose Paragon if
- You need embedded workflows.
- You work on Web, Embedded.
- You also want native integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Hasura or Paragon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hasura starts at Free and Paragon at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hasura or Paragon?
- Hasura has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Hasura and $299/month for Paragon.
- Does Hasura or Paragon run on more platforms?
- Hasura runs on Web. Paragon runs on Web, Embedded.
- Can I use Hasura for free?
- Yes. Hasura has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paragon starts at $299/month.
- What is Hasura best used for?
- Hasura is most often used for automatic graphql api generation from existing databases, real-time data subscriptions for modern applications, backend infrastructure for web and mobile applications, event-triggered webhooks for database changes. Of those, automatic graphql api generation from existing databases and real-time data subscriptions for modern applications are not what Paragon is typically brought in for.
- What can Hasura do that Paragon cannot?
- Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL. Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Native integrations, Workflow builder, Error handling. Both handle Webhooks.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Sanity
- Hasura vs Apigee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hasura vs Thunder Client
- Hasura vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hasura vs 3scale
- Hasura vs Akana
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs AWS API Gateway
- Hasura vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hasura vs Backendless
- Hasura vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Hasura vs n8n
- Hasura vs Zapier
- Hasura vs MuleSoft
- Hasura vs Parabola
- Hasura vs Zapier Plus
- Hasura vs Jitterbit
- Hasura vs mParticle
- Hasura vs RudderStack
- Hasura vs Workato
- Hasura vs Airbyte
- Hasura vs Automate.io
- Hasura vs Boomi
- Hasura vs Browser Use
- Hasura vs Browserbase
- Hasura vs Celigo
- Hasura vs Census
- Hasura vs CrewAI
- Paragon vs Appwrite
- Paragon vs PocketBase
- Paragon vs Sanity
- Paragon vs Apigee
- Paragon vs Bruno
- Paragon vs KeystoneJS
- Paragon vs Parse Server
- Paragon vs Stoplight
- Paragon vs Strapi
- Paragon vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Paragon vs Thunder Client
- Paragon vs WSO2 API Manager
- Paragon vs 3scale
- Paragon vs Akana
- Paragon vs Asyncapi
- Paragon vs AWS API Gateway
- Paragon vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paragon vs Backendless
- Paragon vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Paragon vs n8n
- Paragon vs Zapier
- Paragon vs MuleSoft
- Paragon vs Parabola
- Paragon vs Zapier Plus
- Paragon vs Jitterbit
- Paragon vs mParticle
- Paragon vs RudderStack
- Paragon vs Workato
- Paragon vs Airbyte
- Paragon vs Automate.io
- Paragon vs Boomi
- Paragon vs Browser Use
- Paragon vs Browserbase
- Paragon vs Celigo
- Paragon vs Census
- Paragon vs CrewAI

