Software · head to head
Automate.io vs Hasura

Hasura
Software
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Automate.io no longer exists as a product. automate.io redirects to notion.com, which acquired the company and wound the integration service down; Hasura database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
- They diverge on capability: Automate.io covers Multi-step automations, Hasura covers GraphQL API.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Automate.io and Hasura actually diverge.
| Attribute | Automate.io | Hasura |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Web |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Automate.io
- Multi-step automations
- Conditional logic
- Data mapping
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- API integrations
- 500+ apps
- Slack
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
Both cover
- Webhooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Automate.io
- Workflow Automationnot Hasura
- Data Integrationnot Hasura
- Process Automationnot Hasura
- App Integrationnot Hasura
- API Connectivitynot Hasura
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot Automate.io
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot Automate.io
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot Automate.io
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot Automate.io
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Automate.io
- No longer exists as a product. automate.io redirects to notion.com, which acquired the company and wound the integration service down
- Existing automations were not portable to Notion, so users had to rebuild elsewhere
Hasura
- Database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
Pricing, plan by plan
Automate.io
Free- FreeFree
- 250 tasks/month
- 2 automations
- Starter$15/month
- 5000 tasks/month
- Unlimited automations
- Email support
- Professional$50/month
- Unlimited tasks
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Hasura
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Hasura review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Automate.io if
- You need multi-step automations.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want conditional logic.
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Questions people ask
- Is Automate.io or Hasura better?
- Neither clearly leads. Automate.io starts at Free and Hasura at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Automate.io or Hasura?
- Automate.io starts at Free and Hasura at Free.
- Does Automate.io or Hasura run on more platforms?
- Automate.io runs on Web, Mobile. Hasura runs on Web.
- Can I use Automate.io for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Automate.io best used for?
- Automate.io is most often used for workflow automation, data integration, process automation, app integration. Of those, workflow automation and data integration are not what Hasura is typically brought in for.
- What can Automate.io do that Hasura cannot?
- Automate.io covers Multi-step automations, Conditional logic, Data mapping, Error handling. Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL. Both handle Webhooks.
Related pages
More on Automate.io
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Automate.io vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Automate.io vs n8n
- Automate.io vs Zapier
- Automate.io vs MuleSoft
- Automate.io vs Parabola
- Automate.io vs Zapier Plus
- Automate.io vs Jitterbit
- Automate.io vs mParticle
- Automate.io vs Paragon
- Automate.io vs RudderStack
- Automate.io vs Workato
- Automate.io vs Airbyte
- Automate.io vs Boomi
- Automate.io vs Browser Use
- Automate.io vs Browserbase
- Automate.io vs Celigo
- Automate.io vs Census
- Automate.io vs CrewAI
- Automate.io vs Appwrite
- Automate.io vs PocketBase
- Automate.io vs Sanity
- Automate.io vs Apigee
- Automate.io vs Bruno
- Automate.io vs KeystoneJS
- Automate.io vs Parse Server
- Automate.io vs Stoplight
- Automate.io vs Strapi
- Automate.io vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Automate.io vs Thunder Client
- Automate.io vs WSO2 API Manager
- Automate.io vs 3scale
- Automate.io vs Akana
- Automate.io vs Asyncapi
- Automate.io vs AWS API Gateway
- Automate.io vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Automate.io vs Backendless
- Hasura vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Hasura vs n8n
- Hasura vs Zapier
- Hasura vs MuleSoft
- Hasura vs Parabola
- Hasura vs Zapier Plus
- Hasura vs Jitterbit
- Hasura vs mParticle
- Hasura vs Paragon
- Hasura vs RudderStack
- Hasura vs Workato
- Hasura vs Airbyte
- Hasura vs Boomi
- Hasura vs Browser Use
- Hasura vs Browserbase
- Hasura vs Celigo
- Hasura vs Census
- Hasura vs CrewAI
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Sanity
- Hasura vs Apigee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hasura vs Thunder Client
- Hasura vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hasura vs 3scale
- Hasura vs Akana
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs AWS API Gateway
- Hasura vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hasura vs Backendless

