Software · head to head
Akana vs Paragon
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akana owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com; Paragon no price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- They diverge on capability: Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, Paragon covers Embedded workflows.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akana and Paragon actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akana
- API Lifecycle Management
- API Security
- Governance Controls
- SAML
- LDAP
- Active Directory
- Cloud support
- On-premise support
Only in Paragon
- Embedded workflows
- Native integrations
- Workflow builder
- Error handling
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- Webhooks
- 500+ apps
Both cover
- OAuth
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akana
- API lifecycle management across REST, SOAP and GraphQLnot Paragon
- Applying OAuth, JWT and SAML policies at the gatewaynot Paragon
- Running the same platform on-premises, in Kubernetes or across cloudsnot Paragon
- Developer portal and API monetisationnot Paragon
- Monitoring API traffic and enforcing quotasnot Paragon
Paragon
- Embedding third party integrations into a SaaS productnot Akana
- Managing customer facing connectors without building each onenot Akana
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akana
- Owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
- Pricing is not published; only a 30 day trial is offered
Paragon
- No price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- Cost scales with the number of customer tenants using the integrations, so the bill follows an end customer count rather than the vendor's own usage
- SAML SSO, self hosting, dynamic field mapping and SLAs are all Enterprise only
Pricing, plan by plan
Akana
$2500/monthly- Professional$2500/monthly
- API Gateway
- Developer Portal
- Basic analytics
- Enterprise$5000/monthly
- Advanced governance
- Multi-cloud support
- Premium support
- Custom$undefined/monthly
- Custom solutions
- Dedicated support
- SLA guarantee
Paragon
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- 50 integrations
- Basic support
- Growth$999/month
- 200 integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$5000/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Akana if
- You need api lifecycle management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
- You also want api security.
Choose Paragon if
- You need embedded workflows.
- You work on Web, Embedded.
- You also want native integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Akana or Paragon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Paragon at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akana or Paragon?
- Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Paragon at $299/month.
- Does Akana or Paragon run on more platforms?
- Akana runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid. Paragon runs on Web, Embedded.
- What is Akana best used for?
- Akana is most often used for api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql, applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway, running the same platform on-premises, in kubernetes or across clouds, developer portal and api monetisation. Of those, api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql and applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway are not what Paragon is typically brought in for.
- What can Akana do that Paragon cannot?
- Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, API Security, Governance Controls, SAML. Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Native integrations, Workflow builder, Error handling. Both handle OAuth.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Akana vs Appwrite
- Akana vs Hasura
- Akana vs PocketBase
- Akana vs Sanity
- Akana vs Apigee
- Akana vs Bruno
- Akana vs KeystoneJS
- Akana vs Parse Server
- Akana vs Stoplight
- Akana vs Strapi
- Akana vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Akana vs Thunder Client
- Akana vs WSO2 API Manager
- Akana vs 3scale
- Akana vs Asyncapi
- Akana vs AWS API Gateway
- Akana vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Akana vs Backendless
- Akana vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Akana vs n8n
- Akana vs Zapier
- Akana vs MuleSoft
- Akana vs Parabola
- Akana vs Zapier Plus
- Akana vs Jitterbit
- Akana vs mParticle
- Akana vs RudderStack
- Akana vs Workato
- Akana vs Airbyte
- Akana vs Automate.io
- Akana vs Boomi
- Akana vs Browser Use
- Akana vs Browserbase
- Akana vs Celigo
- Akana vs Census
- Akana vs CrewAI
- Paragon vs Appwrite
- Paragon vs Hasura
- Paragon vs PocketBase
- Paragon vs Sanity
- Paragon vs Apigee
- Paragon vs Bruno
- Paragon vs KeystoneJS
- Paragon vs Parse Server
- Paragon vs Stoplight
- Paragon vs Strapi
- Paragon vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Paragon vs Thunder Client
- Paragon vs WSO2 API Manager
- Paragon vs 3scale
- Paragon vs Asyncapi
- Paragon vs AWS API Gateway
- Paragon vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paragon vs Backendless
- Paragon vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Paragon vs n8n
- Paragon vs Zapier
- Paragon vs MuleSoft
- Paragon vs Parabola
- Paragon vs Zapier Plus
- Paragon vs Jitterbit
- Paragon vs mParticle
- Paragon vs RudderStack
- Paragon vs Workato
- Paragon vs Airbyte
- Paragon vs Automate.io
- Paragon vs Boomi
- Paragon vs Browser Use
- Paragon vs Browserbase
- Paragon vs Celigo
- Paragon vs Census
- Paragon vs CrewAI


