Softwr

Software · head to head

Akana vs Paragon

Akana logo

Akana

Software

Enterprise API lifecycle management platform

From
$2500/monthly
Rated
-
Paragon logo

Paragon

Software

Embedded integration platform for SaaS

From
$299/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Akana owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com; Paragon no price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
  • They diverge on capability: Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, Paragon covers Embedded workflows.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Akana and Paragon actually diverge.

Attributes where Akana and Paragon differ
AttributeAkanaParagon
Starting price$2500/monthly$299/month
PlatformsCloud, On-premise, HybridWeb, Embedded
Founded20012021

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Akana

  • API Lifecycle Management
  • API Security
  • Governance Controls
  • SAML
  • LDAP
  • Active Directory
  • Cloud support
  • On-premise support

Only in Paragon

  • Embedded workflows
  • Native integrations
  • Workflow builder
  • Error handling
  • Monitoring
  • Analytics
  • Webhooks
  • 500+ apps

Both cover

  • OAuth

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Akana

  • API lifecycle management across REST, SOAP and GraphQLnot Paragon
  • Applying OAuth, JWT and SAML policies at the gatewaynot Paragon
  • Running the same platform on-premises, in Kubernetes or across cloudsnot Paragon
  • Developer portal and API monetisationnot Paragon
  • Monitoring API traffic and enforcing quotasnot Paragon

Paragon

  • Embedding third party integrations into a SaaS productnot Akana
  • Managing customer facing connectors without building each onenot Akana

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Akana

  • Owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
  • Pricing is not published; only a 30 day trial is offered

Paragon

  • No price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
  • Cost scales with the number of customer tenants using the integrations, so the bill follows an end customer count rather than the vendor's own usage
  • SAML SSO, self hosting, dynamic field mapping and SLAs are all Enterprise only

Pricing, plan by plan

Akana

$2500/monthly
  • Professional$2500/monthly
    • API Gateway
    • Developer Portal
    • Basic analytics
  • Enterprise$5000/monthly
    • Advanced governance
    • Multi-cloud support
    • Premium support
  • Custom$undefined/monthly
    • Custom solutions
    • Dedicated support
    • SLA guarantee

Paragon

$299/month
  • Starter$299/month
    • 50 integrations
    • Basic support
  • Growth$999/month
    • 200 integrations
    • Priority support
  • Enterprise$5000/month
    • Unlimited integrations
    • Dedicated support

Which should you pick?

Choose Akana if

  • You need api lifecycle management.
  • You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
  • You also want api security.

Choose Paragon if

  • You need embedded workflows.
  • You work on Web, Embedded.
  • You also want native integrations.

Questions people ask

Is Akana or Paragon better?
Neither clearly leads. Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Paragon at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Akana or Paragon?
Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Paragon at $299/month.
Does Akana or Paragon run on more platforms?
Akana runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid. Paragon runs on Web, Embedded.
What is Akana best used for?
Akana is most often used for api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql, applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway, running the same platform on-premises, in kubernetes or across clouds, developer portal and api monetisation. Of those, api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql and applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway are not what Paragon is typically brought in for.
What can Akana do that Paragon cannot?
Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, API Security, Governance Controls, SAML. Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Native integrations, Workflow builder, Error handling. Both handle OAuth.

Related pages

Other head to heads