Software · head to head
Paragon vs Parse Server

Parse Server
Software
Open-source Backend as a Service platform with REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Parse Server has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Paragon no price is published for either plan, and both require a quote; Parse Server deployment complexity and scaling challenges require operational expertise
- They diverge on capability: Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Parse Server covers REST API.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Paragon and Parse Server actually diverge.
| Attribute | Paragon | Parse Server |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $299/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Embedded | Node.js, Express, REST API, GraphQL API |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Paragon
- Embedded workflows
- Native integrations
- Workflow builder
- Error handling
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- 500+ apps
- Custom integrations
Only in Parse Server
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- Authentication
- Node.js
- Cloud functions
- File storage
- Node.js support
- Self-hosted support
Both cover
- Webhooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Paragon
- Embedding third party integrations into a SaaS productnot Parse Server
- Managing customer facing connectors without building each onenot Parse Server
Parse Server
- API Developmentnot Paragon
- API Gatewaynot Paragon
- API Testingnot Paragon
- API Documentationnot Paragon
- Microservicesnot Paragon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Paragon
- No price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- Cost scales with the number of customer tenants using the integrations, so the bill follows an end customer count rather than the vendor's own usage
- SAML SSO, self hosting, dynamic field mapping and SLAs are all Enterprise only
Parse Server
- Deployment complexity and scaling challenges require operational expertise
- Requires database management skills for MongoDB or PostgreSQL administration
- Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Firebase or cloud alternatives
- Query depth bypass vulnerability allowing denial-of-service attacks via complex REST/GraphQL queries
- Stored XSS vulnerability through SVG file uploads requires patching
Pricing, plan by plan
Paragon
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- 50 integrations
- Basic support
- Growth$999/month
- 200 integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$5000/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Dedicated support
Parse Server
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted Parse Server
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Paragon if
- You need embedded workflows.
- You work on Web, Embedded.
- You also want native integrations.
Choose Parse Server if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Node.js, Express, REST API, GraphQL API.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Paragon or Parse Server better?
- Neither clearly leads. Paragon starts at $299/month and Parse Server at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Paragon or Parse Server?
- Parse Server has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $299/month for Paragon and Free for Parse Server.
- Does Paragon or Parse Server run on more platforms?
- Paragon runs on Web, Embedded. Parse Server runs on Node.js, Express, REST API, GraphQL API.
- Can I use Parse Server for free?
- Yes. Parse Server has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paragon starts at $299/month.
- What is Paragon best used for?
- Paragon is most often used for embedding third party integrations into a saas product, managing customer facing connectors without building each one. Of those, embedding third party integrations into a saas product and managing customer facing connectors without building each one are not what Parse Server is typically brought in for.
- What can Paragon do that Parse Server cannot?
- Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Native integrations, Workflow builder, Error handling. Parse Server covers REST API, GraphQL API, Authentication, Node.js. Both handle Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Parse Server: Is Parse Server self-hosted or cloud-managed?
Parse Server is entirely self-hosted and open-source, running on your own infrastructure with no monthly subscription required; you manage the MongoDB or PostgreSQL database and deployment.
Parse Server: What databases does Parse Server support?
Parse Server works with MongoDB and PostgreSQL as data stores, giving you flexibility to choose your preferred database system for your application.
Parse Server: What APIs does Parse Server provide?
Parse Server automatically generates both REST and GraphQL APIs based on your application schema, and you can extend these with custom queries, mutations, and remote schemas.
SourceParse Server: What SDKs are available for Parse Server?
Parse provides native SDKs for iOS (Swift/Objective-C), Android, JavaScript/Node.js, PHP, and .NET, plus REST and GraphQL access for any other platform.
SourceParse Server: Does Parse Server include user authentication?
Yes. Parse Server includes out-of-the-box user management with support for email/password authentication, OAuth providers (Facebook, Twitter, Google, GitHub, LDAP), push notifications, and campaigns.
Related pages
More on Parse Server
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Paragon vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Paragon vs n8n
- Paragon vs Zapier
- Paragon vs MuleSoft
- Paragon vs Parabola
- Paragon vs Zapier Plus
- Paragon vs Jitterbit
- Paragon vs mParticle
- Paragon vs RudderStack
- Paragon vs Workato
- Paragon vs Airbyte
- Paragon vs Automate.io
- Paragon vs Boomi
- Paragon vs Browser Use
- Paragon vs Browserbase
- Paragon vs Celigo
- Paragon vs Census
- Paragon vs CrewAI
- Paragon vs Appwrite
- Paragon vs Hasura
- Paragon vs PocketBase
- Paragon vs Sanity
- Paragon vs Apigee
- Paragon vs Bruno
- Paragon vs KeystoneJS
- Paragon vs Stoplight
- Paragon vs Strapi
- Paragon vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Paragon vs Thunder Client
- Paragon vs WSO2 API Manager
- Paragon vs 3scale
- Paragon vs Akana
- Paragon vs Asyncapi
- Paragon vs AWS API Gateway
- Paragon vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paragon vs Backendless
- Parse Server vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Parse Server vs n8n
- Parse Server vs Zapier
- Parse Server vs MuleSoft
- Parse Server vs Parabola
- Parse Server vs Zapier Plus
- Parse Server vs Jitterbit
- Parse Server vs mParticle
- Parse Server vs RudderStack
- Parse Server vs Workato
- Parse Server vs Airbyte
- Parse Server vs Automate.io
- Parse Server vs Boomi
- Parse Server vs Browser Use
- Parse Server vs Browserbase
- Parse Server vs Celigo
- Parse Server vs Census
- Parse Server vs CrewAI
- Parse Server vs Appwrite
- Parse Server vs Hasura
- Parse Server vs PocketBase
- Parse Server vs Sanity
- Parse Server vs Apigee
- Parse Server vs Bruno
- Parse Server vs KeystoneJS
- Parse Server vs Stoplight
- Parse Server vs Strapi
- Parse Server vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Parse Server vs Thunder Client
- Parse Server vs WSO2 API Manager
- Parse Server vs 3scale
- Parse Server vs Akana
- Parse Server vs Asyncapi
- Parse Server vs AWS API Gateway
- Parse Server vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Parse Server vs Backendless

