Software · head to head
GraphHopper vs CesiumJS

GraphHopper
Software
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

CesiumJS
Software
Open-source JavaScript library for creating 3D globes and 2D maps with support
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CesiumJS has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; CesiumJS the free Community tier does not permit commercial use
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and CesiumJS actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | CesiumJS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that CesiumJS does not also cover.
Only in CesiumJS
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot CesiumJS
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot CesiumJS
CesiumJS
- Streaming 3D terrain, imagery and building data into web applicationsnot GraphHopper
- Tiling and hosting large geospatial and reality capture datasetsnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
CesiumJS
- The free Community tier does not permit commercial use
- The cheapest commercial plan is $149 a month for an individual and $524 for a team
- Team accounts are capped at 5 members on both the Commercial and Premium plans
- Three separate quotas apply at once, being storage, monthly streaming and monthly reality modelling gigapixels, and exceeding any one of them constrains the account
- Streaming is capped at 15 GB a month on the free tier
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
CesiumJS
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the CesiumJS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from CesiumJS on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or CesiumJS better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and CesiumJS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or CesiumJS?
- CesiumJS has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for CesiumJS.
- Does GraphHopper or CesiumJS run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use CesiumJS for free?
- Yes. CesiumJS has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what CesiumJS is typically brought in for.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- CesiumJS vs Mapbox
- CesiumJS vs Google Maps Platform
- CesiumJS vs HERE Technologies
- CesiumJS vs Apple Maps
- CesiumJS vs Leaflet
- CesiumJS vs Esri ArcGIS
- CesiumJS vs Samsara
- CesiumJS vs Bing Maps
- CesiumJS vs CARTO
- CesiumJS vs Geotab
- CesiumJS vs HERE WeGo
- CesiumJS vs IndoorAtlas
- CesiumJS vs Mappedin
- CesiumJS vs Verizon Connect
- CesiumJS vs AllTrails
- CesiumJS vs Citymapper
- CesiumJS vs deck.gl
