Software · head to head
GraphHopper vs Apple Maps

GraphHopper
Software
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Apple Maps
Software
Web mapping and navigation application developed by Apple Inc
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; Apple Maps live traffic updates, public transit info, and satellite view all require an active internet connection, offline mode (iOS 17+) is limited to pre-downloaded areas for driving, walking, cycling, and transit directions
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and Apple Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | Apple Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | iOS, macOS, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that Apple Maps does not also cover.
Only in Apple Maps
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Apple Maps
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Apple Maps
Apple Maps
- Turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigationnot GraphHopper
- Public transit directions with real-time schedules (subways, buses, trains, ferries)not GraphHopper
- Offline turn-by-turn directions for pre-downloaded areas (iOS 17+)not GraphHopper
- Augmented-reality immersive walking directions in supported citiesnot GraphHopper
- Saving custom hiking/walking routes, including U.S. national park hikes, for offline accessnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Apple Maps
- Live traffic updates, public transit info, and satellite view all require an active internet connection, offline mode (iOS 17+) is limited to pre-downloaded areas for driving, walking, cycling, and transit directions
- Apple Maps for the web is only in public beta, not a full-featured release
- Feature depth (e.g. immersive walking AR directions, detailed transit) is strongest on newer iPhones/iOS versions, leaving older devices with a reduced experience
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Apple Maps
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Apple Maps review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from Apple Maps on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or Apple Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and Apple Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or Apple Maps?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and Apple Maps at On request.
- Does GraphHopper or Apple Maps run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. Apple Maps runs on iOS, macOS, Web.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what Apple Maps is typically brought in for.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- Apple Maps vs Mapbox
- Apple Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- Apple Maps vs HERE Technologies
- Apple Maps vs Leaflet
- Apple Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- Apple Maps vs CesiumJS
- Apple Maps vs Samsara
- Apple Maps vs Bing Maps
- Apple Maps vs CARTO
- Apple Maps vs Geotab
- Apple Maps vs HERE WeGo
- Apple Maps vs IndoorAtlas
- Apple Maps vs Mappedin
- Apple Maps vs Verizon Connect
- Apple Maps vs AllTrails
- Apple Maps vs Citymapper
- Apple Maps vs deck.gl
