Network & Connectivity · head to head
Grafana vs Packer
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grafana the free tier retains metrics, logs and traces for 14 days only; Packer packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Grafana covers Dashboard creation, Packer covers Image building.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grafana and Packer actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grafana
- Dashboard creation
- Alerting
- Data source integration
- Visualization plugins
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Packer
- Image building
- Multi-platform support
- Provisioners
- Builders
- Post-processors
- Variables
- Data sources
- Validation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grafana
- Dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and tracesnot Packer
- Running observability across infrastructure and applicationsnot Packer
Packer
- Building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one templatenot Grafana
- Baking golden AMIs and VM images into a CI pipelinenot Grafana
- Creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by Terraformnot Grafana
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grafana
- The free tier retains metrics, logs and traces for 14 days only
- Free is capped at 10,000 active metric series and 50 GB each of logs and traces a month
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
- Logs and traces are billed on three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining data is an ongoing charge rather than a one off, so historical data costs every month it exists
Packer
- Packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Packer to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Packer
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published, and the Change Date is set separately per version
- Alternative licensing for uses outside the grant must be arranged with the licensor rather than taken under the public licence
Pricing, plan by plan
Grafana
Free- FreeFree
- Dashboard creation
- Alerting
- Data source integration
Packer
Free- Open SourceFree
- Multi-platform image building
- Template-driven
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Grafana if
- You need dashboard creation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want alerting.
Choose Packer if
- You need image building.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want multi-platform support.
Questions people ask
- Is Grafana or Packer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grafana starts at Free and Packer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grafana or Packer?
- Grafana starts at Free and Packer at Free.
- Does Grafana or Packer run on more platforms?
- Grafana runs on Web, Api. Packer runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Grafana for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grafana best used for?
- Grafana is most often used for dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and traces, running observability across infrastructure and applications. Of those, dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and traces and running observability across infrastructure and applications are not what Packer is typically brought in for.
- What can Grafana do that Packer cannot?
- Grafana covers Dashboard creation, Alerting, Data source integration, Visualization plugins. Packer covers Image building, Multi-platform support, Provisioners, Builders.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Grafana vs Prometheus
- Grafana vs Cloudflare
- Grafana vs Consul
- Grafana vs Ivanti
- Grafana vs Palo Alto Networks
- Grafana vs Splunk
- Grafana vs Tailscale
- Grafana vs Traefik
- Grafana vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Grafana vs Grafana Cloud
- Grafana vs Neon
- Grafana vs DigitalOcean
- Grafana vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Grafana vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Grafana vs Deno Deploy
- Grafana vs Heroku
- Grafana vs Hetzner Cloud
- Grafana vs Linode
- Grafana vs Pulumi
- Grafana vs Render
- Grafana vs Upstash
- Grafana vs Vagrant
- Grafana vs Vultr
- Grafana vs Akamai
- Grafana vs Alibaba Cloud
- Grafana vs Chef
- Grafana vs Contabo
- Packer vs Prometheus
- Packer vs Cloudflare
- Packer vs Consul
- Packer vs Ivanti
- Packer vs Palo Alto Networks
- Packer vs Splunk
- Packer vs Tailscale
- Packer vs Traefik
- Packer vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Packer vs Grafana Cloud
- Packer vs Neon
- Packer vs DigitalOcean
- Packer vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Packer vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Packer vs Deno Deploy
- Packer vs Heroku
- Packer vs Hetzner Cloud
- Packer vs Linode
- Packer vs Pulumi
- Packer vs Render
- Packer vs Upstash
- Packer vs Vagrant
- Packer vs Vultr
- Packer vs Akamai
- Packer vs Alibaba Cloud
- Packer vs Chef
- Packer vs Contabo

