Softwr

Software · head to head

Packer vs Splunk

P

Packer

Software

Build automated machine images

From
Free
Rated
-
Splunk logo

Splunk

Software

Turn Data Into Doing

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Packer packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence; Splunk no prices are published on any plan; every model requires contacting sales for an estimate
  • They diverge on capability: Packer covers Image building, Splunk covers Log aggregation.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Packer and Splunk actually diverge.

Attributes where Packer and Splunk differ
AttributePackerSplunk
Pricing modelopen-sourceusage-based
PlatformsLinux, Windows, MacWeb, Api
Founded20132003

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Packer

  • Image building
  • Multi-platform support
  • Provisioners
  • Builders
  • Post-processors
  • Variables
  • Data sources
  • Validation

Only in Splunk

  • Log aggregation
  • Real-time monitoring
  • Data visualization
  • Full-text search
  • Custom dashboards
  • Alert management
  • Anomaly detection
  • Log parsing

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Packer

  • Building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one templatenot Splunk
  • Baking golden AMIs and VM images into a CI pipelinenot Splunk
  • Creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by Terraformnot Splunk

Splunk

  • Log search and analysis across infrastructurenot Packer
  • SIEM, SOAR and UEBA for a security operations teamnot Packer
  • Application performance and infrastructure monitoringnot Packer
  • Cloud, private cloud or on-premises deploymentnot Packer

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Packer

  • Packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
  • The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Packer to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Packer
  • Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published, and the Change Date is set separately per version
  • Alternative licensing for uses outside the grant must be arranged with the licensor rather than taken under the public licence

Splunk

  • No prices are published on any plan; every model requires contacting sales for an estimate
  • Three separate pricing models, workload, ingest and entity, so the same deployment costs different amounts depending on which was signed
  • Ingest pricing bills on data volume, so cost tracks how much you log rather than how much value you get from it
  • Security, observability and platform are priced separately

Pricing, plan by plan

Packer

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Multi-platform image building
    • Template-driven
    • Provisioner support

Splunk

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Log aggregation
    • Real-time monitoring
    • Data visualization

Which should you pick?

Choose Packer if

  • You need image building.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
  • You also want multi-platform support.

Choose Splunk if

  • You need log aggregation.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want real-time monitoring.

Questions people ask

Is Packer or Splunk better?
Neither clearly leads. Packer starts at Free and Splunk at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Packer or Splunk?
Packer starts at Free and Splunk at Free.
Does Packer or Splunk run on more platforms?
Packer runs on Linux, Windows, Mac. Splunk runs on Web, Api.
Can I use Packer for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Packer best used for?
Packer is most often used for building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one template, baking golden amis and vm images into a ci pipeline, creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by terraform. Of those, building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one template and baking golden amis and vm images into a ci pipeline are not what Splunk is typically brought in for.
What can Packer do that Splunk cannot?
Packer covers Image building, Multi-platform support, Provisioners, Builders. Splunk covers Log aggregation, Real-time monitoring, Data visualization, Full-text search.

Related pages

Other head to heads