Software · head to head
Grafana vs Linode
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grafana the free tier retains metrics, logs and traces for 14 days only; Linode linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- They diverge on capability: Grafana covers Dashboard creation, Linode covers Compute instances.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grafana and Linode actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grafana
- Dashboard creation
- Alerting
- Data source integration
- Visualization plugins
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
Only in Linode
- Compute instances
- Object storage
- Block storage
- Kubernetes
- Managed database
- Load balancers
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Both cover
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grafana
- Dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and tracesnot Linode
- Running observability across infrastructure and applicationsnot Linode
Linode
- Running Linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated CPU plansnot Grafana
- Managed Kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud accountnot Grafana
- Hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regionsnot Grafana
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grafana
- The free tier retains metrics, logs and traces for 14 days only
- Free is capped at 10,000 active metric series and 50 GB each of logs and traces a month
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
- Logs and traces are billed on three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining data is an ongoing charge rather than a one off, so historical data costs every month it exists
Linode
- linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- Charges accrue for any service on the account even when it is powered off, because RAM and network capacity stay reserved; only deleting the service stops billing
- Network transfer beyond the monthly allotment is billed from $0.005 per GB and the rate varies by region
- The Akamai Cloud pricing landing page shows no rates and directs visitors to regional pricing pages or sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Grafana
Free- FreeFree
- Dashboard creation
- Alerting
- Data source integration
Linode
Free- Nanode 1GB$5/month
- 1GB RAM
- 1 vCPU
- 25GB SSD
- Linode 4GB$20/month
- 4GB RAM
- 2 vCPU
- 80GB SSD
Which should you pick?
Choose Grafana if
- You need dashboard creation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want alerting.
Choose Linode if
- You need compute instances.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want object storage.
Questions people ask
- Is Grafana or Linode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grafana starts at Free and Linode at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grafana or Linode?
- Grafana starts at Free and Linode at Free.
- Does Grafana or Linode run on more platforms?
- Grafana runs on Web, Api. Linode runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use Grafana for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grafana best used for?
- Grafana is most often used for dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and traces, running observability across infrastructure and applications. Of those, dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and traces and running observability across infrastructure and applications are not what Linode is typically brought in for.
- What can Grafana do that Linode cannot?
- Grafana covers Dashboard creation, Alerting, Data source integration, Visualization plugins. Linode covers Compute instances, Object storage, Block storage, Kubernetes. Both handle Web support, Api support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Grafana vs Prometheus
- Grafana vs Cloudflare
- Grafana vs Consul
- Grafana vs Ivanti
- Grafana vs Palo Alto Networks
- Grafana vs Splunk
- Grafana vs Tailscale
- Grafana vs Traefik
- Grafana vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Grafana vs Grafana Cloud
- Grafana vs Neon
- Grafana vs DigitalOcean
- Grafana vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Grafana vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Grafana vs Deno Deploy
- Grafana vs Heroku
- Grafana vs Hetzner Cloud
- Grafana vs Packer
- Grafana vs Pulumi
- Grafana vs Render
- Grafana vs Upstash
- Grafana vs Vagrant
- Grafana vs Vultr
- Grafana vs Akamai
- Grafana vs Alibaba Cloud
- Grafana vs Chef
- Grafana vs Contabo
- Linode vs Prometheus
- Linode vs Cloudflare
- Linode vs Consul
- Linode vs Ivanti
- Linode vs Palo Alto Networks
- Linode vs Splunk
- Linode vs Tailscale
- Linode vs Traefik
- Linode vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Linode vs Grafana Cloud
- Linode vs Neon
- Linode vs DigitalOcean
- Linode vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Linode vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Linode vs Deno Deploy
- Linode vs Heroku
- Linode vs Hetzner Cloud
- Linode vs Packer
- Linode vs Pulumi
- Linode vs Render
- Linode vs Upstash
- Linode vs Vagrant
- Linode vs Vultr
- Linode vs Akamai
- Linode vs Alibaba Cloud
- Linode vs Chef
- Linode vs Contabo


