Software · head to head
Grafana vs Grafana Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grafana the free tier retains metrics, logs and traces for 14 days only; Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- They diverge on capability: Grafana covers Dashboard creation, Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grafana and Grafana Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grafana | Grafana Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (2014).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grafana
- Dashboard creation
- Alerting
- Data source integration
- Visualization plugins
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grafana
- Dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and tracesnot Grafana Loki
- Running observability across infrastructure and applicationsnot Grafana Loki
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Grafana
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Grafana
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grafana
- The free tier retains metrics, logs and traces for 14 days only
- Free is capped at 10,000 active metric series and 50 GB each of logs and traces a month
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
- Logs and traces are billed on three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining data is an ongoing charge rather than a one off, so historical data costs every month it exists
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Pricing, plan by plan
Grafana
Free- FreeFree
- Dashboard creation
- Alerting
- Data source integration
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Grafana if
- You need dashboard creation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want alerting.
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Grafana or Grafana Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grafana starts at Free and Grafana Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grafana or Grafana Loki?
- Grafana starts at Free and Grafana Loki at Free.
- Does Grafana or Grafana Loki run on more platforms?
- Grafana runs on Web, Api. Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- Can I use Grafana for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grafana best used for?
- Grafana is most often used for dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and traces, running observability across infrastructure and applications. Of those, dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and traces and running observability across infrastructure and applications are not what Grafana Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Grafana do that Grafana Loki cannot?
- Grafana covers Dashboard creation, Alerting, Data source integration, Visualization plugins. Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Grafana Loki
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Grafana vs Prometheus
- Grafana vs Cloudflare
- Grafana vs Consul
- Grafana vs Ivanti
- Grafana vs Palo Alto Networks
- Grafana vs Splunk
- Grafana vs Tailscale
- Grafana vs Traefik
- Grafana vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Grafana vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana vs New Relic
- Grafana vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana vs Coralogix
- Grafana vs CloudWatch
- Grafana vs Dynatrace
- Grafana vs InfluxDB
- Grafana vs Airbrake
- Grafana vs AppDynamics
- Grafana vs Axiom
- Grafana vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana vs Better Stack
- Grafana vs Bugsnag
- Grafana vs Dynatrace Logs
- Grafana vs Elastic
- Grafana vs Elastic APM
- Grafana vs Elasticsearch Service
- Grafana vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Prometheus
- Grafana Loki vs Cloudflare
- Grafana Loki vs Consul
- Grafana Loki vs Ivanti
- Grafana Loki vs Palo Alto Networks
- Grafana Loki vs Splunk
- Grafana Loki vs Tailscale
- Grafana Loki vs Traefik
- Grafana Loki vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Airbrake
- Grafana Loki vs AppDynamics
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Bugsnag
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack


