Log Management · head to head
Grafana Loki vs Ivanti
Ivanti
Network & Connectivity
Security, service management, and unified endpoint management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Grafana Loki has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment; Ivanti no pricing is published on the products page; the only routes are Contact Our Team or the How to Buy page describing the sales process, per ivanti.com, August 2026
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grafana Loki and Ivanti actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grafana Loki | Ivanti |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) | Web |
| Category | Log Management | Network & Connectivity |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Ivanti
Nothing recorded that Grafana Loki does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Ivanti
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Ivanti
Ivanti
No use cases recorded yet. See the Ivanti review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Ivanti
- No pricing is published on the products page; the only routes are Contact Our Team or the How to Buy page describing the sales process, per ivanti.com, August 2026
Pricing, plan by plan
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Ivanti
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ivanti review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Ivanti if
Nothing in the data separates Ivanti from Grafana Loki on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Grafana Loki or Ivanti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grafana Loki starts at Free and Ivanti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grafana Loki or Ivanti?
- Grafana Loki has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Grafana Loki and On request for Ivanti.
- Does Grafana Loki or Ivanti run on more platforms?
- Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support). Ivanti runs on Web.
- Can I use Grafana Loki for free?
- Yes. Grafana Loki has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ivanti starts at On request.
- What is Grafana Loki best used for?
- Grafana Loki is most often used for cost-sensitive organisations deploying kubernetes and prometheus ecosystems, teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environments. Of those, cost-sensitive organisations deploying kubernetes and prometheus ecosystems and teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environments are not what Ivanti is typically brought in for.
- What can Grafana Loki do that Ivanti cannot?
- Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective.
Related pages
More on Grafana Loki
Other head to heads
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Airbrake
- Grafana Loki vs AppDynamics
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Bugsnag
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Prometheus
- Grafana Loki vs Cloudflare
- Grafana Loki vs Consul
- Grafana Loki vs Grafana
- Grafana Loki vs Palo Alto Networks
- Grafana Loki vs Splunk
- Grafana Loki vs Tailscale
- Grafana Loki vs Traefik
- Grafana Loki vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Ivanti vs Elastic Stack
- Ivanti vs New Relic
- Ivanti vs Datadog Logs
- Ivanti vs Coralogix
- Ivanti vs CloudWatch
- Ivanti vs Dynatrace
- Ivanti vs InfluxDB
- Ivanti vs Airbrake
- Ivanti vs AppDynamics
- Ivanti vs Axiom
- Ivanti vs Azure Monitor
- Ivanti vs Better Stack
- Ivanti vs Bugsnag
- Ivanti vs Dynatrace Logs
- Ivanti vs Elastic
- Ivanti vs Elastic APM
- Ivanti vs Elasticsearch Service
- Ivanti vs ELK Stack
- Ivanti vs Prometheus
- Ivanti vs Cloudflare
- Ivanti vs Consul
- Ivanti vs Grafana
- Ivanti vs Palo Alto Networks
- Ivanti vs Splunk
- Ivanti vs Tailscale
- Ivanti vs Traefik
- Ivanti vs Ubiquiti UniFi

