Logging · head to head
Azure Monitor vs Kibana
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Kibana requires Elasticsearch; it is a front end for data held there rather than a standalone analytics tool
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Kibana covers Data visualization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Kibana actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | Kibana |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
Only in Kibana
- Data visualization
- Dashboard creation
- Log discovery
- Alerting
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Kibana
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Kibana
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Kibana
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Kibana
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Kibana
Kibana
- Querying and visualising data held in Elasticsearchnot Azure Monitor
- Dashboards over log and metric datanot Azure Monitor
- Anomaly detection with machine learning jobsnot Azure Monitor
- Geospatial analysis on indexed location datanot Azure Monitor
- Alerting on query thresholdsnot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Kibana
- Requires Elasticsearch; it is a front end for data held there rather than a standalone analytics tool
- Self-managed means running and scaling the Elastic stack yourself
- Cost is not Kibana's own; it follows whichever Elastic deployment sits underneath
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Kibana
Free- FreeFree
- Data visualization
- Dashboard creation
- Log discovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose Kibana if
- You need data visualization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want dashboard creation.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or Kibana better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Kibana at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Kibana?
- Azure Monitor starts at Free and Kibana at Free.
- Does Azure Monitor or Kibana run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Kibana is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that Kibana cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Kibana covers Data visualization, Dashboard creation, Log discovery, Alerting. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Monitor: How does Azure Monitor billing work?
Billing is based on data volume ingested into Azure Monitor. Additional charges apply separately for alerts, notifications, web tests, and data export. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription.
SourceKibana: Is Kibana available for free?
Kibana is offered with a free trial across all deployment models (Elastic Cloud Serverless, Hosted, and self-managed). Kibana is a component of the Elastic product suite and is not priced separately.
SourceAzure Monitor: What savings are available with Azure Monitor?
Capacity reservations offer up to 36% savings compared to standard pay-as-you-go pricing when you commit to reserved capacity upfront.
SourceKibana: How is Kibana priced?
Kibana pricing is bundled with Elasticsearch or other Elastic products. Pricing varies by deployment model: Elastic Cloud Serverless uses usage-based pricing, Hosted uses resource-based pricing, and self-managed is free to download.
SourceAzure Monitor: Is there a free tier for Azure Monitor?
No dedicated free tier exists. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription, but detailed monitoring requires additional configuration and associated costs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Monitor
Other head to heads
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Cronitor
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Honeybadger
- Azure Monitor vs Raygun
- Azure Monitor vs Retrace
- Azure Monitor vs Rollbar
- Azure Monitor vs Sematext
- Azure Monitor vs Splunk Cloud
- Azure Monitor vs Stackdriver
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic APM
- Azure Monitor vs Splunk Enterprise
- Azure Monitor vs InfluxDB
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic
- Azure Monitor vs Fluentd
- Azure Monitor vs Graylog
- Azure Monitor vs Traceloop
- Azure Monitor vs Logz.io
- Azure Monitor vs Grafana Loki
- Azure Monitor vs incident.io
- Azure Monitor vs Telegraf
- Kibana vs Elastic Stack
- Kibana vs New Relic
- Kibana vs Datadog Logs
- Kibana vs Coralogix
- Kibana vs Cronitor
- Kibana vs Dynatrace
- Kibana vs Airbrake
- Kibana vs AppDynamics
- Kibana vs Honeybadger
- Kibana vs Raygun
- Kibana vs Retrace
- Kibana vs Rollbar
- Kibana vs Sematext
- Kibana vs Splunk Cloud
- Kibana vs Stackdriver
- Kibana vs Elastic APM
- Kibana vs Splunk Enterprise
- Kibana vs InfluxDB
- Kibana vs Elastic
- Kibana vs Fluentd
- Kibana vs Graylog
- Kibana vs Traceloop
- Kibana vs Logz.io
- Kibana vs Grafana Loki
- Kibana vs incident.io
- Kibana vs Telegraf


