Software · head to head
FaunaDB vs Dgraph

FaunaDB
Software
The distributed serverless database for modern applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FaunaDB the Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.; Dgraph the GitHub repository (dgraph-io/dgraph) is licensed Apache 2.0 with no paid tier, cloud offering, or enterprise edition mentioned anywhere in the README
- They diverge on capability: FaunaDB covers Document-relational Model, Dgraph covers Native GraphQL.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FaunaDB and Dgraph actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FaunaDB
- Document-relational Model
- GraphQL API
- Global Distribution
- Temporal Queries
- Multi-tenancy
- Serverless
- Netlify
- Vercel
Only in Dgraph
- Native GraphQL
- Distributed Architecture
- GraphQL Subscriptions
- Full-text Search
- Geolocation Queries
- Horizontal Scaling
- Ratel UI
- Slash GraphQL
Both cover
- ACID Transactions
- GraphQL
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FaunaDB
- Serverless applicationsnot Dgraph
- Rapid prototypingnot Dgraph
- Mobile backendsnot Dgraph
- JAMstacknot Dgraph
- Microservicesnot Dgraph
Dgraph
- Knowledge graphsnot FaunaDB
- Fraud detectionnot FaunaDB
- Recommendation enginesnot FaunaDB
- Network analysisnot FaunaDB
- Master data managementnot FaunaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FaunaDB
- The Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
Dgraph
- The GitHub repository (dgraph-io/dgraph) is licensed Apache 2.0 with no paid tier, cloud offering, or enterprise edition mentioned anywhere in the README
Pricing, plan by plan
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Dgraph
Free- CommunityFree
- Native GraphQL
- Graph queries
- Full-text search
- Cloud$39/month
- Managed service
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need document-relational model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want graphql api.
Choose Dgraph if
- You need native graphql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want distributed architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is FaunaDB or Dgraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. FaunaDB starts at Free and Dgraph at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FaunaDB or Dgraph?
- FaunaDB starts at Free and Dgraph at Free.
- Does FaunaDB or Dgraph run on more platforms?
- FaunaDB runs on Web. Dgraph runs on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use FaunaDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FaunaDB best used for?
- FaunaDB is most often used for serverless applications, rapid prototyping, mobile backends, jamstack. Of those, serverless applications and rapid prototyping are not what Dgraph is typically brought in for.
- What can FaunaDB do that Dgraph cannot?
- FaunaDB covers Document-relational Model, GraphQL API, Global Distribution, Temporal Queries. Dgraph covers Native GraphQL, Distributed Architecture, GraphQL Subscriptions, Full-text Search. Both handle ACID Transactions, GraphQL, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs Elasticsearch
- FaunaDB vs PlanetScale
- FaunaDB vs Azure SQL
- FaunaDB vs ClickHouse
- FaunaDB vs Couchbase
- FaunaDB vs DuckDB
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs MariaDB
- FaunaDB vs Oracle Database
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Apache Druid
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- Dgraph vs Cockroach Labs
- Dgraph vs PostgreSQL
- Dgraph vs Airtable
- Dgraph vs Amazon Aurora
- Dgraph vs Elasticsearch
- Dgraph vs PlanetScale
- Dgraph vs Azure SQL
- Dgraph vs ClickHouse
- Dgraph vs Couchbase
- Dgraph vs DuckDB
- Dgraph vs DynamoDB
- Dgraph vs MariaDB
- Dgraph vs Oracle Database
- Dgraph vs Amazon RDS
- Dgraph vs Amazon Redshift
- Dgraph vs Apache Druid
- Dgraph vs Cassandra
- Dgraph vs CouchDB

