Software · head to head
Chef vs FaunaDB

FaunaDB
Software
The distributed serverless database for modern applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chef priced per node per year, at $59 on Business and $189 on Enterprise, so cost scales with fleet size rather than with team size; FaunaDB the Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
- They diverge on capability: Chef covers Recipes, FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chef and FaunaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chef
- Recipes
- Cookbooks
- Roles
- Data bags
- Attributes
- Chef Server
- Chef Infra
- Chef Compliance
Only in FaunaDB
- ACID Transactions
- Document-relational Model
- GraphQL API
- Global Distribution
- Temporal Queries
- Multi-tenancy
- Serverless
- GraphQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chef
- Configuration management and infrastructure automation across server fleetsnot FaunaDB
- Enforcing compliance and audit policy on managed nodesnot FaunaDB
FaunaDB
- Serverless applicationsnot Chef
- Rapid prototypingnot Chef
- Mobile backendsnot Chef
- JAMstacknot Chef
- Microservicesnot Chef
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chef
- Priced per node per year, at $59 on Business and $189 on Enterprise, so cost scales with fleet size rather than with team size
- Tripling the price between the two published tiers puts compliance and audit features well above basic automation
- Enterprise Plus and every self managed deployment are custom quoted with no published price
FaunaDB
- The Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chef
Free- Open SourceFree
- Chef Infra
- Community support
- Full functionality
- Chef Automate$4000/year
- Chef Infra
- Compliance automation
- Insights
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Chef if
- You need recipes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want cookbooks.
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want document-relational model.
Questions people ask
- Is Chef or FaunaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chef starts at Free and FaunaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chef or FaunaDB?
- Chef starts at Free and FaunaDB at Free.
- Does Chef or FaunaDB run on more platforms?
- Chef runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api. FaunaDB runs on Web.
- Can I use Chef for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chef best used for?
- Chef is most often used for configuration management and infrastructure automation across server fleets, enforcing compliance and audit policy on managed nodes. Of those, configuration management and infrastructure automation across server fleets and enforcing compliance and audit policy on managed nodes are not what FaunaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Chef do that FaunaDB cannot?
- Chef covers Recipes, Cookbooks, Roles, Data bags. FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions, Document-relational Model, GraphQL API, Global Distribution.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Chef vs Grafana Cloud
- Chef vs Neon
- Chef vs DigitalOcean
- Chef vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Chef vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Chef vs Deno Deploy
- Chef vs Heroku
- Chef vs Hetzner Cloud
- Chef vs Linode
- Chef vs Packer
- Chef vs Pulumi
- Chef vs Render
- Chef vs Upstash
- Chef vs Vagrant
- Chef vs Vultr
- Chef vs Akamai
- Chef vs Alibaba Cloud
- Chef vs Contabo
- Chef vs Cockroach Labs
- Chef vs PostgreSQL
- Chef vs Airtable
- Chef vs Amazon Aurora
- Chef vs Elasticsearch
- Chef vs PlanetScale
- Chef vs Azure SQL
- Chef vs ClickHouse
- Chef vs Couchbase
- Chef vs DuckDB
- Chef vs DynamoDB
- Chef vs MariaDB
- Chef vs Oracle Database
- Chef vs Amazon RDS
- Chef vs Amazon Redshift
- Chef vs Apache Druid
- Chef vs Cassandra
- Chef vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs Grafana Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Neon
- FaunaDB vs DigitalOcean
- FaunaDB vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- FaunaDB vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- FaunaDB vs Deno Deploy
- FaunaDB vs Heroku
- FaunaDB vs Hetzner Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Linode
- FaunaDB vs Packer
- FaunaDB vs Pulumi
- FaunaDB vs Render
- FaunaDB vs Upstash
- FaunaDB vs Vagrant
- FaunaDB vs Vultr
- FaunaDB vs Akamai
- FaunaDB vs Alibaba Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Contabo
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs Elasticsearch
- FaunaDB vs PlanetScale
- FaunaDB vs Azure SQL
- FaunaDB vs ClickHouse
- FaunaDB vs Couchbase
- FaunaDB vs DuckDB
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs MariaDB
- FaunaDB vs Oracle Database
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Apache Druid
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB

