Software · head to head
OnShape vs PrusaSlicer
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OnShape the free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private; PrusaSlicer limited to slicing workflow only; no interactive 3D design capabilities
- They diverge on capability: OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD, PrusaSlicer covers Automatic supports.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OnShape and PrusaSlicer actually diverge.
| Attribute | OnShape | PrusaSlicer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | open-source |
| Platforms | Web, IOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (2012).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OnShape
- Cloud-native CAD
- Real-time collaboration
- Version control
- Part studios
- Assemblies
- Drawings
- FeatureScript
- Mobile access
Only in PrusaSlicer
- Automatic supports
- Multi-material
- Variable layer height
- Custom G-code
- Paint-on supports
- Ironing
- Prusa printers
- Most FDM printers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OnShape
- Cloud based parametric CAD without local workstation installsnot PrusaSlicer
- Collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documentsnot PrusaSlicer
PrusaSlicer
- Preparation of STL models for 3D printingnot OnShape
- Multi-material printing preparationnot OnShape
- G-code generation and customisation via macrosnot OnShape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OnShape
- The free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- The Standard plan is $1,500 per user per year and Professional $2,500
- Simulation, rendering, CAM and advanced PDM all require the Professional plan
- SSO, analytics and advanced administration are Enterprise only with no published price
PrusaSlicer
- Limited to slicing workflow only; no interactive 3D design capabilities
- Designed for RepRap-based printers; compatibility with other printer architectures varies
Pricing, plan by plan
OnShape
Free- FreeFree
- Limited features
- Public documents
- Standard$1500/month
- Private documents
- Full features
- Professional$2100/month
- Advanced simulation
- Enterprise features
PrusaSlicer
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PrusaSlicer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose OnShape if
- You need cloud-native cad.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Choose PrusaSlicer if
- You need automatic supports.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want multi-material.
Questions people ask
- Is OnShape or PrusaSlicer better?
- Neither clearly leads. OnShape starts at Free and PrusaSlicer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OnShape or PrusaSlicer?
- OnShape starts at Free and PrusaSlicer at Free.
- Does OnShape or PrusaSlicer run on more platforms?
- OnShape runs on Web, IOS, Android. PrusaSlicer runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use OnShape for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OnShape best used for?
- OnShape is most often used for cloud based parametric cad without local workstation installs, collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documents. Of those, cloud based parametric cad without local workstation installs and collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documents are not what PrusaSlicer is typically brought in for.
- What can OnShape do that PrusaSlicer cannot?
- OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD, Real-time collaboration, Version control, Part studios. PrusaSlicer covers Automatic supports, Multi-material, Variable layer height, Custom G-code.
Related pages
More on PrusaSlicer
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- OnShape vs Enscape
- OnShape vs V-Ray
- OnShape vs FreeCAD
- OnShape vs KeyShot
- OnShape vs Lumion
- OnShape vs Houdini
- OnShape vs Arnold
- OnShape vs Inventor
- OnShape vs Mudbox
- OnShape vs Corona Renderer
- OnShape vs D5 Render
- OnShape vs Twinmotion
- OnShape vs LightWave 3D
- OnShape vs OpenSCAD
- OnShape vs Siemens NX
- OnShape vs ZBrush
- OnShape vs 3D-Coat
- OnShape vs Alibre Design
- PrusaSlicer vs Enscape
- PrusaSlicer vs V-Ray
- PrusaSlicer vs FreeCAD
- PrusaSlicer vs KeyShot
- PrusaSlicer vs Lumion
- PrusaSlicer vs Houdini
- PrusaSlicer vs Arnold
- PrusaSlicer vs Inventor
- PrusaSlicer vs Mudbox
- PrusaSlicer vs Corona Renderer
- PrusaSlicer vs D5 Render
- PrusaSlicer vs Twinmotion
- PrusaSlicer vs LightWave 3D
- PrusaSlicer vs OpenSCAD
- PrusaSlicer vs Siemens NX
- PrusaSlicer vs ZBrush
- PrusaSlicer vs 3D-Coat
- PrusaSlicer vs Alibre Design


