Agriculture · head to head
Conservis vs Traction

Conservis
Agriculture
Comprehensive farm management for row crops
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Conservis acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio; Traction limited to farm accounting and field data, less comprehensive than full farm management ERPs
- They diverge on capability: Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Traction covers Equipment marketplace.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Conservis and Traction actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Conservis
- Field & crop planning
- Input management
- Activity tracking
- Financial management
- Inventory control
- Equipment tracking
- Harvest tracking
- Custom reporting
Only in Traction
- Equipment marketplace
- Parts sourcing
- Dealer management
- Price analytics
- Lead generation
- DMS systems
- Website builders
- CRM platforms
Both cover
- SSL
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Conservis
- Farm ERP covering the business rather than the agronomynot Traction
- Grain contract managementnot Traction
- Crop planning and budgeting against actualsnot Traction
- Work order management across an operationnot Traction
- Reporting plans versus actuals for lenders and partnersnot Traction
Traction
- Equipment buying/sellingnot Conservis
- Inventory managementnot Conservis
- Market analysisnot Conservis
- Lead generationnot Conservis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Conservis
- Acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio
Traction
- Limited to farm accounting and field data, less comprehensive than full farm management ERPs
- Integration capabilities are limited to John Deere and Climate FieldView platforms
Pricing, plan by plan
Conservis
On request- Standard$undefined/year
- Field management
- Activity tracking
- Basic reporting
- Professional$undefined/year
- Everything in Standard
- Financial management
- Inventory control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Everything in Professional
- Multi-entity management
- API access
Traction
$950/year- Basic$950/year
- Farm accounting
- Field records
- Basic reporting
- Plus$1950/year
- Farm accounting
- Field records
- Advanced reporting
- Pro$3950/year
- Farm accounting
- Field records
- Advanced reporting
Which should you pick?
Choose Conservis if
- You need field & crop planning.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want input management.
Choose Traction if
- You need equipment marketplace.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want parts sourcing.
Questions people ask
- Is Conservis or Traction better?
- Neither clearly leads. Conservis starts at On request and Traction at $950/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Conservis or Traction?
- Conservis starts at On request and Traction at $950/year.
- Does Conservis or Traction run on more platforms?
- Conservis runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Traction runs on Web, Mobile.
- What is Conservis best used for?
- Conservis is most often used for farm erp covering the business rather than the agronomy, grain contract management, crop planning and budgeting against actuals, work order management across an operation. Of those, farm erp covering the business rather than the agronomy and grain contract management are not what Traction is typically brought in for.
- What can Conservis do that Traction cannot?
- Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Input management, Activity tracking, Financial management. Traction covers Equipment marketplace, Parts sourcing, Dealer management, Price analytics. Both handle SSL, Cloud deployment, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Traction: Does Traction Ag integrate with John Deere equipment?
Yes. Traction Ag integrates with the John Deere Operations Center, allowing farmers to automatically pull in field data for application, tillage, seeding, and harvest records.
SourceTraction: What is the starting price for Traction Ag?
Traction Ag offers three pricing tiers: Basic starts at $950 per year, Plus costs $1,950 per year, and Pro costs $3,950 per year.
SourceTraction: Does Traction Ag offer a free trial?
Yes. Traction Ag offers a 30-day free trial providing access to farm accounting, field operations, and agronomy features.
SourceTraction: What is the main difference between Traction Ag and other farm management software?
Traction Ag is the only farm management solution uniquely built for the cloud, integrating actual accounting numbers with field operations to provide real-time financial analysis.
SourceTraction: Can Traction Ag manage multiple farms?
Yes. Traction Ag includes multi-entity access under one login, allowing farmers to manage multiple farms and see field profitability tracking across all operations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Conservis vs FarmERP
- Conservis vs Granular
- Conservis vs Farmbrite
- Conservis vs fieldmargin
- Conservis vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Conservis vs CropX
- Conservis vs AgriSync
- Conservis vs Bushel
- Conservis vs AgriWebb
- Conservis vs CropTracker Pro
- Conservis vs PrecisionHawk
- Conservis vs Netafim NetBeat
- Conservis vs Nofence
- Conservis vs Sentera
- Conservis vs SMARTBOW
- Conservis vs Soil Scout
- Conservis vs 365FarmNet
- Conservis vs Bushel Farm
- Conservis vs MyJohnDeere
- Conservis vs FarmLogs
- Conservis vs Indigo Agriculture
- Conservis vs Proagrica
- Conservis vs DTN Agriculture
- Conservis vs DJI Agriculture
- Conservis vs Farmers Business Network (FBN)
- Conservis vs DroneDeploy
- Conservis vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Conservis vs DairyComp
- Conservis vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Conservis vs Valley Irrigation
- Conservis vs Baseline Irrigation
- Conservis vs Galcon
- Traction vs FarmERP
- Traction vs Granular
- Traction vs Farmbrite
- Traction vs fieldmargin
- Traction vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Traction vs CropX
- Traction vs AgriSync
- Traction vs Bushel
- Traction vs AgriWebb
- Traction vs CropTracker Pro
- Traction vs PrecisionHawk
- Traction vs Netafim NetBeat
- Traction vs Nofence
- Traction vs Sentera
- Traction vs SMARTBOW
- Traction vs Soil Scout
- Traction vs 365FarmNet
- Traction vs Bushel Farm
- Traction vs MyJohnDeere
- Traction vs FarmLogs
- Traction vs Indigo Agriculture
- Traction vs Proagrica
- Traction vs DTN Agriculture
- Traction vs DJI Agriculture
- Traction vs Farmers Business Network (FBN)
- Traction vs DroneDeploy
- Traction vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Traction vs DairyComp
- Traction vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Traction vs Valley Irrigation
- Traction vs Baseline Irrigation
- Traction vs Galcon

