Software · head to head
Bruno vs Insomnia

Bruno
Software
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Insomnia
Software
REST and GraphQL API client for development and testing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; Insomnia git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only
- They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, Insomnia covers REST API Client.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bruno and Insomnia actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- Git repositories
- Local file system
Only in Insomnia
- REST API Client
- GraphQL Support
- gRPC Support
- GitLab
- Slack
- Web support
Both cover
- GitHub
- Windows support
- MacOS support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Insomnia
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Insomnia
- Offline API development without an accountnot Insomnia
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Insomnia
Insomnia
- Sending and debugging HTTP, GraphQL and gRPC requestsnot Bruno
- Storing collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Bruno
- Mocking an API endpoint before it existsnot Bruno
- Running collections in CI with the Inso CLInot Bruno
- Environment management across staging and productionnot Bruno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Insomnia
- Git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only
- Mock servers are capped at 1,000 requests a month on free, then $10 per 25,000
- Role-based access control requires Pro at $12 per user per month
- SSO, SCIM and vault integrations are Enterprise only at $45 per user per month
- Working without an account is limited to the local-only Scratch Pad
Pricing, plan by plan
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full IDE features
- Git integration
- Local storage
Insomnia
Free- FreeFree
- REST, GraphQL, gRPC support
- Local data
- Pro$5/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
- Team$30/monthly
- Team management
- Advanced analytics
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Choose Insomnia if
- You need rest api client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web.
- You also want graphql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Bruno or Insomnia better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and Insomnia at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bruno or Insomnia?
- Bruno starts at Free and Insomnia at Free.
- Does Bruno or Insomnia run on more platforms?
- Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Insomnia runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web.
- Can I use Bruno for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bruno best used for?
- Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Insomnia is typically brought in for.
- What can Bruno do that Insomnia cannot?
- Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, Git repositories. Insomnia covers REST API Client, GraphQL Support, gRPC Support, GitLab. Both handle GitHub, Windows support, MacOS support, Linux support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Apigee
- Bruno vs KeystoneJS
- Bruno vs Parse Server
- Bruno vs Stoplight
- Bruno vs Strapi
- Bruno vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs WSO2 API Manager
- Bruno vs 3scale
- Bruno vs Akana
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Backendless
- Bruno vs BrowserStack
- Bruno vs BugHerd
- Bruno vs CircleCI
- Bruno vs Cypress
- Bruno vs GitHub Actions
- Bruno vs Playwright
- Bruno vs Zephyr Scale
- Insomnia vs Appwrite
- Insomnia vs Hasura
- Insomnia vs PocketBase
- Insomnia vs Sanity
- Insomnia vs Apigee
- Insomnia vs KeystoneJS
- Insomnia vs Parse Server
- Insomnia vs Stoplight
- Insomnia vs Strapi
- Insomnia vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Insomnia vs Thunder Client
- Insomnia vs WSO2 API Manager
- Insomnia vs 3scale
- Insomnia vs Akana
- Insomnia vs Asyncapi
- Insomnia vs AWS API Gateway
- Insomnia vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Insomnia vs Backendless
- Insomnia vs BrowserStack
- Insomnia vs BugHerd
- Insomnia vs CircleCI
- Insomnia vs Cypress
- Insomnia vs GitHub Actions
- Insomnia vs Playwright
- Insomnia vs Zephyr Scale
